Honda Car Forum


 

Go Back   Honda Car Forum - Accord Parts Civic Tuning Acura Racing > Honda Acura > Honda 2


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 14 Oct 2006, 12:34 am
LL
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Did I get Lied to?

I have a 1997 Honda Accord. I is the SE model (a 2 door with sun roof and a
non-vetec engine and custom stock brushed alum. wheels)
Since I'm at 190,000 miles, it was time to get a 3 rd set of tires. (Michelin
MX4V's)
When I picked up the car I noticed that they had balanced the wheels by putting
the big ugly weights on the outside! I knew they weren't like that before and
objected to that. After much discussion they consented to do an aesthetic
balance but warned that it would never be as accurate.
Later as I looked at the new ticket I noticed that they had it down of a "static
balance". I then objected to that and said I had paid for a dynamic balance.
They said that it was not possible to do so if the tires were balanced from the
back. That got me to thinking. And I remembered that when I had the prior set
put on I stood in the shop and watched the man do a dynamic balance.
..
It sound like to me they tried to do a quick, job. Didn't want to redo the
balance work at all. The only a quick freebie static job.
..
I looked at dozens of cars with wheels similar to mine around the parking lot of
the mall after that. Some had weights in the front (mostly older cars) but 90%
did not (none of the brand new cars with stock tires and wheels).
..
Is is possible to do a credible balance job with weights on the back of the rim
only?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 14 Oct 2006, 01:21 am
jim beam
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Did I get Lied to?

LL wrote:
<snip>.
> Is is possible to do a credible balance job with weights on the back of the rim
> only?


yes. they're b.s.ing you. the weights are supposed to be stuck to the
rim just inside the spokes and it balances the wheel no problem.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 14 Oct 2006, 01:41 am
Eric
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Did I get Lied to?

jim beam wrote:
>
> LL wrote:
> <snip>.
> > Is is possible to do a credible balance job with weights on the back
> > of the rim only?

>
> yes. they're b.s.ing you. the weights are supposed to be stuck to the
> rim just inside the spokes and it balances the wheel no problem.


I'll second that (they're either lazy and lying to you or they're
incompetent). By the way, just so other folks can know not to go there,
where did you get your tires?

Eric
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 14 Oct 2006, 02:49 am
Elmo P. Shagnasty
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Did I get Lied to?

In article <VF_Xg.40918$FU7.35468@fe01.news.easynews.com>,
"LL" <LL@LL.com> wrote:

> When I picked up the car I noticed that they had balanced the wheels by
> putting
> the big ugly weights on the outside!


Yep.

Did you ask for weights on the inside? If not, you're likely to get
them on the outside.

Tain't no big deal. Let it go.

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 15 Oct 2006, 12:25 pm
John Horner
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Did I get Lied to?

LL wrote:

> Later as I looked at the new ticket I noticed that they had it down of a "static
> balance". I then objected to that and said I had paid for a dynamic balance.
> They said that it was not possible to do so if the tires were balanced from the
> back.



They lied, pure and simple. A backside only dynamic balance is done
using adhesive stick on weights inside the rim but as close to the
outside as possible for one plane and all the way to the inside for the
other plane. This has been common aluminum wheel practice for decades
now.


John
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 15 Oct 2006, 12:39 pm
Matt Ion
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Did I get Lied to?

John Horner wrote:
> LL wrote:
>
>> Later as I looked at the new ticket I noticed that they had it down of
>> a "static
>> balance". I then objected to that and said I had paid for a dynamic
>> balance.
>> They said that it was not possible to do so if the tires were balanced
>> from the
>> back.

>
>
>
> They lied, pure and simple. A backside only dynamic balance is done
> using adhesive stick on weights inside the rim but as close to the
> outside as possible for one plane and all the way to the inside for the
> other plane. This has been common aluminum wheel practice for decades now.


Agreed - they lied, as Eric said, either because they're lazy or incompetent. If
they charged extra for the balancing, I'd just ask for that money back, and then
take it somewhere else.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 15 Oct 2006, 10:34 pm
LL
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Did I get Lied to?

Thanks to everyone who answered. That's what I kinda thought.
..
I was at a Discount Tire store. They also do business in some places as
America's Tire. After looking around on the web, I got a list and called around
for prices. They beat the competition by about $100 on the set of Michelins. I
just about settled for a set of Goodyears at Sears when the mechanic there
stumbled into the showroom from the shop floor. He looked like his night job
was at a meth lab. So that was out. There I are about 4 local owned outlets
for tires here that I would prefer to patronize but their shops were a mess and
I didn't feel that the extra 100 or more that they wanted for the tires was
justified.
..
I have read the other thread about these Energy Tires. I'm an easy driver and
am willing to accept the limitations the tires may have for the extra mileage.
My MPG dropped by about 3 miles when I replaced the stock tires for a set of
cheap Dunlop. The price of all that extra gas over 50,000 miles was a lot
(aprox. 1725 vs 1650 gallons). Plus the road noise jumped. My first trip out
of town last weekend I found these tires extremely quiet. My 10 y\o car is
still rock solid with not rattles.
..
The tires cost $448 for a set of 4. They also charge $45 for "installation,
balancing, and lifetime spin balancing." Since they lied to me, I really don't
trust them to re-balance the tires. They could just as easily intentionally
unbalance the tires to make their prediction come true that I would experience
vibration if I insisted on a back side balance. So the Lifetime balance really
has no value to me.
..
My plan now is to contact corporate, ask for my $45 back so I can go to a
independent and get the tires balanced. They will likely refuse but the local
manager will probably hear about it. It IS merely aesthetic. So in that I'm
not out that much, its not that big a deal. I STILL got a good set of tires at
a good price.
What is a big deal is that I was treated like a chump. That's pretty
offensive to me.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 17 Oct 2006, 12:16 pm
John Horner
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Did I get Lied to?

LL wrote:

> What is a big deal is that I was treated like a chump. That's pretty
> offensive to me.


I would be angry too!

FWIW, my favorite way to buy tires is to order them from tirerack.com
and then use a local independent service shop which does not sell a lot
of tires to do the install and balance. Most small shops have tire
equipment even if they don't use it a lot. In fact, tirerack.com's
website has a feature to look up co-operating local installers. This
way I get a great price on the tires and get the labor done by people
who are actual real live mechanics, not the poorly trained monkeys one
often finds at chain stores.

John
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
I think my Honda dealer lied about my Fit dgk Honda 2 41 05 Oct 2006 06:18 pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:46 pm.


Attribution:
Honda News | Autoblog
Powered by Yahoo Answers

Archive: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457



Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.3.2 © 2009, Crawlability, Inc.
HondaCarForum.com is not affiliated with Honda Motor Company in any way. Honda Motor Company does not sponsor, support, or endorse HondaCarForum.com in any way. Copyright/trademark/sales mark infringements are not intended or implied.