Honda Car Forum |
|
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Social Groups | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Honda Parts Search |
|
| ||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Could someone please tell me if you own a 1987 vehicle, on which day it
will qualify to be exempted from the Ontario DriveClean emission test? Does it mean that Jan 1, 2007? Or does it mean Jan 1, 2008 when it will be exempted? |
|
|||
|
"Joseph" <spmok2@canada.com> wrote in news:1158199464.969993.96430
@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com: > Could someone please tell me if you own a 1987 vehicle, on which day it > will qualify to be exempted from the Ontario DriveClean emission test? > Does it mean that Jan 1, 2007? Or does it mean Jan 1, 2008 when it > will be exempted? > > It is exempt when it is 20 model years old. The last year for testing 1987 models is this year. It's all here: www.driveclean.com Click on "FAQ: Historic vehicles..." -- TeGGeR® The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ www.tegger.com/hondafaq/ |
|
|||
|
"TeGGeR®" <tegger@tegger.c0m> wrote in message > > > It is exempt when it is 20 model years old. The last year for testing 1987 > models is this year. So, like some of our states, if it is old and pollutes a lot, you can let it get older, pollute even more and we'll make it exempt. A few weeks ago, I was on a two lane road, no place to pass, following a mid-70's Old. I was actually getting sick from the fumes and had to drop back quite a bit to get some clean air. |
|
|||
|
"Edwin Pawlowski" <esp@snet.net> wrote in
news:Uj3Og.638$Ij.361@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com: > > "TeGGeR®" <tegger@tegger.c0m> wrote in message >> >> >> It is exempt when it is 20 model years old. The last year for testing >> 1987 models is this year. > > So, like some of our states, if it is old and pollutes a lot, you can > let it get older, pollute even more and we'll make it exempt. > > A few weeks ago, I was on a two lane road, no place to pass, following > a mid-70's Old. I was actually getting sick from the fumes and had to > drop back quite a bit to get some clean air. > > > Problem is, 20-year old cars make up perhaps 1% of the cars on the road. And most of those are not daily drivers. Are you aware that the air is 57% cleaner in absolute terms now than it was in 1970? That's in spite of a 153% increase in vehicular traffic. The US federal EPA says so and you could look it up. Including 20+ cars is pure politics and social engineering. It accomplishes nothing except make those cars more expensive and problematic to own, which is the point. -- TeGGeR® The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ www.tegger.com/hondafaq/ |
|
|||
|
"TeGGeR®" <tegger@tegger.c0m> wrote in news:Xns983DE9CB1E86Btegger@
207.14.116.130: > Problem is, 20-year old cars make up perhaps 1% of the cars on the road. > And most of those are not daily drivers. > > Are you aware that the air is 57% cleaner in absolute terms now than it > was in 1970? That's in spite of a 153% increase in vehicular traffic. > The US federal EPA says so and you could look it up. > > Including 20+ cars is pure politics and social engineering. It > accomplishes nothing except make those cars more expensive and > problematic to own, which is the point. > All of this guilt trip over driving your car is to divert public attention from the WORST air polluters.....jet airplanes and power plants, the worst of the worst corporate polluters. Delta Airlines' jet fuel buyer was on MSNBC discussing fuel prices with the stock broker talking heads complaining this was eating into profits becuase JUST DELTA AIRLINES BURNED 9.4 BILLION GALLONS IN 2004! If we're REALLY interested in air quality, we need to turn off the oil burners that make my patio black with soot and build NUCLEAR power plants.... I'm doing my part with my 33-year-old Mercedes 220 Diesel, shortly I hope: http://www.frybrid.com/ At one corner near my home, I've already gotten commitments for over 190 gallons of used frying oil per WEEK!...FREE! Jabulon's oil barons can kiss my ass! -- There's amazing intelligence in the Universe. You can tell because none of them ever called Earth. |
|
|||
|
JUST DELTA AIRLINES BURNED 9.4 BILLION GALLONS IN 2004!
> > If we're REALLY interested in air quality, we need to turn off the oil > burners that make my patio black with soot and build NUCLEAR power > plants.... > > I'm doing my part with my 33-year-old Mercedes 220 Diesel, shortly I > hope: > http://www.frybrid.com/ > At one corner near my home, I've already gotten commitments for over 190 > gallons of used frying oil per WEEK!...FREE! > Jabulon's oil barons can kiss my ass! > Thanks for doing your part to help the environment. If more people were like you, the Earth would be a lot better off. As it is, people put more effort into planning their weekly TV viewing schedules than thinking about energy, conservation, saving the Earth. My brother had an '85 Mercedes 300TD wagon and he ran veggie oil in it. Some idiot ran into him and totaled it though. He's looking for a 1970's 240D now. He was thinking of starting a co-cop for used veggie oil. We were to process it, and sell it in like 10 gallon containers. They could take the containers home and use them as needed. Then bring the containers back to get refilled. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
|
|||
|
If the vehicle is 1987 and older it will be exempt since its last
required testing was 2 yrs ago. If the vehicle is 1988 and newer it will have to be tested until it reaches the federally reconized age to classify as "antique" which is 30 years old. So my 89 chev "B" body wagon has to be tested until 2019. Of course this is also dependant on where you live some regions still dont have to do testing. Snow... Joseph wrote: > Could someone please tell me if you own a 1987 vehicle, on which day it > will qualify to be exempted from the Ontario DriveClean emission test? > Does it mean that Jan 1, 2007? Or does it mean Jan 1, 2008 when it > will be exempted? |
|
|||
|
"TeGGeR®" <tegger@tegger.c0m> wrote in
news:Xns983DE9CB1E86Btegger@207.14.116.130: > "Edwin Pawlowski" <esp@snet.net> wrote in > news:Uj3Og.638$Ij.361@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com: > >> >> "TeGGeR®" <tegger@tegger.c0m> wrote in message >>> >>> >>> It is exempt when it is 20 model years old. The last year for testing >>> 1987 models is this year. >> >> So, like some of our states, if it is old and pollutes a lot, you can >> let it get older, pollute even more and we'll make it exempt. >> >> A few weeks ago, I was on a two lane road, no place to pass, following >> a mid-70's Old. I was actually getting sick from the fumes and had to >> drop back quite a bit to get some clean air. >> >> >> > > > > Problem is, 20-year old cars make up perhaps 1% of the cars on the road. > And most of those are not daily drivers. Car and Driver magazine used to say that most of the pollution from autos was from the small percent that was not kept up or maintained,the gross polluters. IIRC,1% was the number they used. > > Are you aware that the air is 57% cleaner in absolute terms now than it > was in 1970? That's in spite of a 153% increase in vehicular traffic. > The US federal EPA says so and you could look it up. > > Including 20+ cars is pure politics and social engineering. It > accomplishes nothing except make those cars more expensive and > problematic to own, which is the point. > > Cars naturally get more expensive to maintain as they get older. They get more problems as they get older and things wear out or degrade from heat,ozone,sun,vibration/flexing,rust or corrosion. -- Jim Yanik jyanik at kua.net |
|
|||
|
umm.... There is one problem though. I just happen to buy this 1987 car off someone else. So that means it must pass emission before I can get it plated and drive it. I am thinking of just let it sit for 3.5 months (Oct,Nov,Dec) then when the clock rolls over to 2007. Right now I have another beater to drive. I will take the safety certificate to the MTO and get it plated. That is if we are all correct about it not requiring an emission in 2007. What do you think. Snow wrote: > If the vehicle is 1987 and older it will be exempt since its last > required testing was 2 yrs ago. If the vehicle is 1988 and newer it > will have to be tested until it reaches the federally reconized age to > classify as "antique" which is 30 years old. So my 89 chev "B" body > wagon has to be tested until 2019. > > Of course this is also dependant on where you live some regions still > dont have to do testing. > > Snow... > > > Joseph wrote: > > Could someone please tell me if you own a 1987 vehicle, on which day it > > will qualify to be exempted from the Ontario DriveClean emission test? > > Does it mean that Jan 1, 2007? Or does it mean Jan 1, 2008 when it > > will be exempted? |
|
|||
|
grappletech <noone@removenowhere.biz> wrote in news:1158212770_23479
@sp6iad.superfeed.net: > Thanks for doing your part to help the environment. Am I the only one to notice how CLEAN and BLUE the sky was in the week after 9/11 when they grounded them all? Not one word, of course, was said about it on any of the Propaganda News Channels the corporations run from Airline ad money. Of course, that also stopped the chemical seeding in all those contrails. Go to google and put contrails seeding into the search engine. There's thousands of websites, now.....and great movies on the subject. HAARP weapon - be very afraid. www.haarp.com Cars aren't polluting the planet beyond repair any more than 2-stroke outboard motors are polluting the lakes to death. -- There's amazing intelligence in the Universe. You can tell because none of them ever called Earth. |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Ontario Drive Clean Test Question | Dario Moreno | Honda 2 | 3 | 23 Oct 2005 05:13 pm |
| 89 Accord emission failed in CO test 25/25 | rajakaraja | Honda 2 | 1 | 30 Jul 2004 08:58 am |
| Ontario emission test,FLUNKED,then PASSED,then PASSED again,WHY? | M.A. Stewart | Honda 2 | 1 | 13 Jul 2004 04:21 pm |
| Ontario emission test, FLUNKED, then PASSED, then PASSED again, WHY? | M.A. Stewart | Honda 3 | 1 | 01 Jul 2004 09:49 pm |
| Emission Test: Pass | Sean | Acura | 1 | 12 Jan 2004 05:03 pm |