Honda Car Forum | |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Honda Parts Search |
|
| ||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Michael Rose wrote:
> I was looking at a 2006 Honda Civic and I asked the saleman if the engine > was a Non-interference engine and I got a blank look > So guys help me out here...is it or isn't it!....Thanks > why does it bother you? |
|
|||
|
> I was looking at a 2006 Honda Civic and I asked the saleman if the engine
> was a Non-interference engine and I got a blank look > So guys help me out here...is it or isn't it!....Thanks Why would it matter if it is or it isn't? |
|
|||
|
Michael Rose wrote:
> I was looking at a 2006 Honda Civic and I asked the saleman if the engine > was a Non-interference engine and I got a blank look > So guys help me out here...is it or isn't it!....Thanks I don't know, but it doesn't matter because the engine uses a timing chain instead of a belt. |
|
|||
|
High Tech Misfit wrote:
> Michael Rose wrote: > > >>I was looking at a 2006 Honda Civic and I asked the saleman if the engine >>was a Non-interference engine and I got a blank look >> So guys help me out here...is it or isn't it!....Thanks > > > I don't know, but it doesn't matter because the engine uses a timing chain > instead of a belt. Don't count on it "not mattering" for that... my old GLC died a messy death when an improperly-adjusted timing chain slipped a tooth. |
|
|||
|
Very simple....if it is a non-interference engine and your timing belt or
chain breaks it doesn't hurt the engine.... "Steve Mackie" <smackie@eastlink.ca> wrote in message news:JSHDg.2948$395.490@edtnps90... >> I was looking at a 2006 Honda Civic and I asked the saleman if the engine >> was a Non-interference engine and I got a blank look >> So guys help me out here...is it or isn't it!....Thanks > > Why would it matter if it is or it isn't? > > |
|
|||
|
"High Tech Misfit" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:hpqnzvtbujv8.dlg@hightech.misfit... > Michael Rose wrote: > >> I was looking at a 2006 Honda Civic and I asked the saleman if the engine >> was a Non-interference engine and I got a blank look >> So guys help me out here...is it or isn't it!....Thanks > > I don't know, but it doesn't matter because the engine uses a timing chain > instead of a belt. IMHO chains have not proven themselves much more reliable than belts. Maybe they have improved, but the last car I had with a chain (an 84 Dodge with a Mitsu engine) didn't make it 100K miles before the chain was worn enough to jump. The first step in replacement was: remove engine from car. Mike |
|
|||
|
In all my years, I've spun more bearings (2) than I've ever broken a timing
chain (0), or belt for that matter. Again, why would it matter if it is or it isn't? Do you plan on not maintaining your vehicle after you purchase it? Steve > Very simple....if it is a non-interference engine and your timing belt or > chain breaks it doesn't hurt the engine.... > "Steve Mackie" <smackie@eastlink.ca> wrote in message > news:JSHDg.2948$395.490@edtnps90... > >> I was looking at a 2006 Honda Civic and I asked the saleman if the engine > >> was a Non-interference engine and I got a blank look > >> So guys help me out here...is it or isn't it!....Thanks > > > > Why would it matter if it is or it isn't? > > > > > > |
|
|||
|
"Michael Pardee" <michaeltnull@cybertrails.com> wrote in
news:A5-dnehaCoSgP0LZnZ2dnUVZ_oGdnZ2d@sedona.net: > "High Tech Misfit" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message > news:hpqnzvtbujv8.dlg@hightech.misfit... >> Michael Rose wrote: >> >>> I was looking at a 2006 Honda Civic and I asked the saleman if the >>> engine was a Non-interference engine and I got a blank look >>> So guys help me out here...is it or isn't it!....Thanks >> >> I don't know, but it doesn't matter because the engine uses a timing >> chain instead of a belt. > > IMHO chains have not proven themselves much more reliable than belts. Depends on the engine design. Certain cars were notorious for eating timing chains. The Nissan Axxess had one such. On the the opposite side, the old Toyota timing chains were very well designed. They'd wear and get noisy, but never break or jump. -- TeGGeR® The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ www.tegger.com/hondafaq/ |
|
|||
|
"Steve Mackie" <smackie@eastlink.ca> wrote in message
news:7DNDg.5231$365.4900@edtnps89... > > Again, why would it matter if it is or it isn't? Do you plan on not > maintaining your vehicle after you purchase it? > > Steve > Even an engine maintained on schedule is susceptible to sudden death by valve crash. Usually that comes from water pump failure if the water pump is driven by the timing belt. In that respect chain driven engines are "safer." Mike |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Timing Belt / interference engine ( 98 Accord) | gary_jabo@my-deja.com | Honda 3 | 5 | 23 Dec 2006 07:36 pm |
| Re: 1995 Civic LX interference engine? | gallawl | Honda 2 | 0 | 02 Nov 2005 04:35 pm |
| 1995 Civic LX interference engine? | gallawl | Honda 2 | 2 | 14 Oct 2005 10:05 pm |
| Interference engine? | EUGENE KIMBALL | Honda 2 | 6 | 14 Oct 2004 05:20 pm |
| 03 Accord... Interference engine | Al Kondo | Honda 3 | 1 | 13 Jul 2004 02:11 pm |