Honda Car Forum


 

Go Back   Honda Car Forum - Accord Parts Civic Tuning Acura Racing > Honda Acura > Honda 2


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 08 Apr 2006, 11:56 pm
larson.joshua@gmail.com
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default 1991 timing belt question

hello,

i am doing the head gasket on my 1991 civic. if there's any advice on
this subject, feel free, but my real question is about timing.

there seems to be a paradoxical aspect to replacing the timing belt.
first of all, my crankshaft pulley has no markings. secondly, all the
instructions i've seen requires the lower timing belt cover to be
installed before you can use the indicators on it to adjust the
position of the belt. however you cannot adjust the belt with the
cover on. am i missing something?

also, is there a more reliable way to find TDC than to stick something
through the spark plug hole and watching for TDC? it seems so
inaccurate... i suppose that's what the markings are for, but i've
already pointed out the connundrum there.

thanks!

josh

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 09 Apr 2006, 12:37 am
Alan
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 1991 timing belt question


larson.joshua@gmail.com wrote:
> hello,
>
> i am doing the head gasket on my 1991 civic. if there's any advice on
> this subject, feel free, but my real question is about timing.
>
> there seems to be a paradoxical aspect to replacing the timing belt.
> first of all, my crankshaft pulley has no markings. secondly, all the
> instructions i've seen requires the lower timing belt cover to be
> installed before you can use the indicators on it to adjust the
> position of the belt. however you cannot adjust the belt with the
> cover on. am i missing something?
>
> also, is there a more reliable way to find TDC than to stick something
> through the spark plug hole and watching for TDC? it seems so
> inaccurate... i suppose that's what the markings are for, but i've
> already pointed out the connundrum there.


There's supposed to be two side marks on the cam shaft pully to make
parallel with the surface of the top of the head with the word UP on
top of the gear pully.

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 09 Apr 2006, 06:26 am
Elle
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 1991 timing belt question

<larson.joshua@gmail.com> wrote
> hello,
>
> i am doing the head gasket on my 1991 civic. if there's
> any advice on
> this subject, feel free, but my real question is about
> timing.
>
> there seems to be a paradoxical aspect to replacing the
> timing belt.
> first of all, my crankshaft pulley has no markings.


Does the pulley look anything like the following?

http://www.norcalcrx.org/fig_6.jpg

Mind you, though, I think you're confusing fine-tuning the
ignition timing (which requires a timing light and using the
marks in the photo above) with properly aligning the timing
belt, crankshaft sprocket, and camshaft sprocket. Certainly
if the timing belt isn't installed so that the camshaft and
crankshaft are "in synch," you will have major problems fine
tuning the ignition timing subsequently. So both involve
timing, but they're different steps for tuning one's car.

> secondly, all the
> instructions i've seen requires the lower timing belt
> cover to be
> installed before you can use the indicators on it to
> adjust the
> position of the belt. however you cannot adjust the belt
> with the
> cover on. am i missing something?


I think you are missing something.

What do you mean by "adjust the belt"?

You want to ensure that the camshaft is "in synch" with the
crankshaft. That's accomplished by making sure that the
camshaft and crankshaft are fixed in the proper position
when you install the timing belt. That's actually very
tricky, unless you do the following: Prior to removing the
old timing belt, mark with a Sharpie marker or "White-Out"
teeth on the camshaft sprocket and their coinciding belt
teeth. Do the same at the crankshaft sprocket. When you have
the belt off, lay the new one next to it, and mark its teeth
exactly as the old belt's teeth are marked.

> also, is there a more reliable way to find TDC than to
> stick something
> through the spark plug hole and watching for TDC? it
> seems so
> inaccurate... i suppose that's what the markings are for,
> but i've
> already pointed out the connundrum there.


Are you using a manual? www.autozone.com has a free online
manual for your 91 Civic. Otherwise, see above and Alan's
comments.


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 09 Apr 2006, 07:29 am
William Burke
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 1991 timing belt question

There is a square hole on top of tranny below the #4 spark plug. You
will see a pointer. Turn your engine untill you see the letter "T",
that's TDC. Same hole you use to adjust ignition timming.

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 09 Apr 2006, 10:52 am
larson.joshua@gmail.com
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 1991 timing belt question

obviously i would have marked all this up, but i lost the factory
"setting" when i did this the first time a while ago when i was still
green. i think the belt that i had put on then was off by a tooth, so
i'm more or less starting over this time.

okay, i took a closer look at the crankshaft pulley and the marking are
there, they were just obscured and had lost their paint. there is a
series of three markings, which i think are ignition timing markings.
there is one more marking, slightly clockwise of the three, which
according to the auto zone online manual is the TDC mark. see figure 5
under the '91 engine section:

http://www.autozone.com/servlet/UiBr...3d80141329.jsp

so, as you can see, in order to align the crankshaft pulley, you must
have both the lower timing belt cover installed and the crankshaft
pulley installed. both these items make it impossible to actually put
on the timing belt. so all i can think of is that you must install the
lower timing belt cover and the crankshaft pulley, align for TDC,
remove those two items without disturbing the crankshaft, align the
camshaft with the two lines on the sprocket on the same plane as the
head (with UP up) and slip on the belt.

is this right? i still need to look into William Burke's suggestion...

thanks for your help. this is the best honda forum i've run across yet!

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 09 Apr 2006, 11:08 am
'Curly Q. Links'
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 1991 timing belt question

larson.joshua@gmail.com wrote:
>
> hello,
>
> i am doing the head gasket on my 1991 civic. if there's any advice on
> this subject, feel free, but my real question is about timing.
>
> there seems to be a paradoxical aspect to replacing the timing belt.
> first of all, my crankshaft pulley has no markings. secondly, all the
> instructions i've seen requires the lower timing belt cover to be
> installed before you can use the indicators on it to adjust the
> position of the belt. however you cannot adjust the belt with the
> cover on. am i missing something?
>
> also, is there a more reliable way to find TDC than to stick something
> through the spark plug hole and watching for TDC? it seems so
> inaccurate... i suppose that's what the markings are for, but i've
> already pointed out the connundrum there.
>
> thanks!
>
> josh

-------------------------------------

Read this, and all the other stuff that surrounds it.

http://www.tegger.com/hondafaq/crankbolt.html

'Curly'
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 09 Apr 2006, 05:55 pm
Elle
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 1991 timing belt question

<larson.joshua@gmail.com> wrote
> obviously i would have marked all this up, but i lost the
> factory
> "setting" when i did this the first time a while ago when
> i was still
> green.


The price of Usenet posts is sometimes thinks aren't obvious
to the reader. I understand where you're at now. :-)

> i think the belt that i had put on then was off by a
> tooth, so
> i'm more or less starting over this time.
>
> okay, i took a closer look at the crankshaft pulley and
> the marking are
> there, they were just obscured and had lost their paint.
> there is a
> series of three markings, which i think are ignition
> timing markings.


Correct.

> there is one more marking, slightly clockwise of the
> three, which
> according to the auto zone online manual is the TDC mark.


Correct.

> See figure 5
> under the '91 engine section:
>
> http://www.autozone.com/servlet/UiBr...3d80141329.jsp
>
> so, as you can see, in order to align the crankshaft
> pulley, you must
> have both the lower timing belt cover installed and the
> crankshaft
> pulley installed. both these items make it impossible to
> actually put
> on the timing belt. so all i can think of is that you
> must install the
> lower timing belt cover and the crankshaft pulley, align
> for TDC,
> remove those two items without disturbing the crankshaft,
> align the
> camshaft with the two lines on the sprocket on the same
> plane as the
> head (with UP up) and slip on the belt.
>
> is this right?


Yes. Figure 5 above is exactly what's in the Service Manual
as well. Autozone has mostly Chilton's and Haynes manual
stuff, but occasionally exactly what's in the Factory
Service manual is in these manuals, too.

You just install everything loosely in order to get the
crankshaft sprocket "in synch" with the camshaft sprocket.
Then, yes, it all comes off again to get the belt on.

I agree it's going to be a little tricky to get the belt on
so the two shafts are as in synch as possible. I confess I
bet it's darn easy to be off a TB tooth. I'd mark things at
every attempt, to keep track. Being off a tooth will be
obvious.

Keep checking back to see if anyone has other ideas. I have
done a whole whopping single TB change in my life but I
researched the matter like mad and had a lot of help here. I
did the white-out thing and it worked great.

> i still need to look into William Burke's suggestion...
>
> thanks for your help. this is the best honda forum i've
> run across yet!


Yes, it's a good group. And we always agree on everything.
;-)

See also the Concerto and CRX service manuals at
http://www.honda.co.uk/car/owner/workshop.html . Sometimes
the service manual is superior to the pretty much Chilton's
manual at the autozone site.


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 09 Apr 2006, 07:57 pm
larson.joshua@gmail.com
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 1991 timing belt question

thanks so much. i'll revive the thread if i have any more questions.

josh

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 09 Apr 2006, 10:21 pm
Eric
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 1991 timing belt question

Elle wrote:

>
> You just install everything loosely in order to get the
> crankshaft sprocket "in synch" with the camshaft sprocket.
> Then, yes, it all comes off again to get the belt on.
>


Why create extra work for yourself? With all the timing belts I've done
over the years, I've never had to do that. Just set the crank so that
keyway notch is as close to up as you can get it, put the belt and lower
covers on, the cam should be aligned by the pulley markings, once you get
the lower cover and crank pulley on fine tune the crank's position, then
pull the belt up over the cam pulley, adjust the belt tension (there's an
access hole in the lower cover), spin the engine over by hand a couple of
revolutions and recheck the timing marks, and be done with it. There's no
need to remove the lower cover once you get the new belt on, nor have I ever
found it necessary to put marks on the belt or pulleys. I also usually
recheck the ignition timing once the car warms up. If it was OK with the
old belt, then it should be OK with new belt. A degree of difference might
be attributable to belt stretch, but it'll be much worse if you've skipped a
tooth. I usually find no change in the ignition timing if the belt was
installed correctly.

Eric
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
1991 Honda Accord Timing belt Fijoy George Honda 3 10 05 May 2007 06:02 pm
1991 Accord timing belt schedule question dgk Honda 2 10 18 Aug 2006 10:20 am
timing belt question... qslim Honda 3 1 14 Nov 2004 10:20 pm
Timing Belt Question Kurgan666 Honda 3 7 30 Aug 2004 06:57 pm
timing belt question amanda Honda 3 2 29 Oct 2003 08:52 pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:34 pm.


Attribution:
Honda News | Autoblog
Powered by Yahoo Answers

Archive: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457



Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.3.2 © 2009, Crawlability, Inc.
HondaCarForum.com is not affiliated with Honda Motor Company in any way. Honda Motor Company does not sponsor, support, or endorse HondaCarForum.com in any way. Copyright/trademark/sales mark infringements are not intended or implied.