Honda Car Forum


 

Go Back   Honda Car Forum - Accord Parts Civic Tuning Acura Racing > Honda Acura > Honda 2


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 05 Apr 2006, 12:43 pm
TeGGeR®
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default More updates to the Unofficial FAQ

Thanks to jim beam and Curly, this page has been seriously revised with
lots more info:
http://www.tegger.com/hondafaq/cranktool/index.html

Mant other things have been shuffled around as well, so when you go to the
Main Page, please hit Reload/Refresh to make sure all changes show.
http://www.tegger.com/hondafaq/faq.html

I also found a few broken internal links. How come nobody notifies me of
these things?

My ultimate aim is to make the Main Page just an index, with all data
opening up in new windows off that. This should reduce download times for
the Main Page.

--
TeGGeR®

The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 05 Apr 2006, 02:31 pm
Elle
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: More updates to the Unofficial FAQ

"TeGGeR®" <tegger@tegger.c0m> wrote
> I also found a few broken internal links. How come nobody
> notifies me of
> these things?


Perhaps because there are things even more important than
broken links with which people have objections. Agreeing to
disagree is often the best way to go with you, along with a
lot of patience (or just ignoring you) when you go into the
mode, "My way is the best way. I can't prove it. But it is."

Thus my silence on your latest page.


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 05 Apr 2006, 03:28 pm
Brian Smith
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: More updates to the Unofficial FAQ


"Elle" <honda.lioness@nospam.earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:kWUYf.12067$Bj7.7703@newsread2.news.pas.earth link.net...
>
> Perhaps because there are things even more important than broken links
> with which people have objections. Agreeing to disagree is often the best
> way to go with you, along with a lot of patience (or just ignoring you)
> when you go into the mode, "My way is the best way. I can't prove it. But
> it is."
>
> Thus my silence on your latest page.


Boy, you must have rolled out and hit your head on the wrong side of the bed
today!


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 05 Apr 2006, 03:38 pm
Bucky
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: More updates to the Unofficial FAQ

TeGGeR® wrote:
> I also found a few broken internal links. How come nobody notifies me of
> these things?


There's free tools that can scan your site for broken links. You should
look into those. I haven't used one before, so I can't recommend one.

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 05 Apr 2006, 08:47 pm
TeGGeR®
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: More updates to the Unofficial FAQ

"Bucky" <uw_badgers@email.com> wrote in
news:1144269522.575786.93330@j33g2000cwa.googlegro ups.com:

> TeGGeR® wrote:
>> I also found a few broken internal links. How come nobody notifies me of
>> these things?

>
> There's free tools that can scan your site for broken links. You should
> look into those. I haven't used one before, so I can't recommend one.
>



I never thought of that, so thanks for the tip.

I just Googled and quite a number of these utilities come up. They're also
called "link checkers". I see most of them want you to pay for them, so
some sleuthing will be necessary before I find a freeware version.

--
TeGGeR®

The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 06 Apr 2006, 01:51 am
Bucky
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: More updates to the Unofficial FAQ

TeGGeR® wrote:
> I just Googled and quite a number of these utilities come up. They're also
> called "link checkers". I see most of them want you to pay for them, so
> some sleuthing will be necessary before I find a freeware version.


Yeah, probably the online services will charge fees, since those will
use their servers and resources. I'm referring to software that you
install on your own computer (it doesn't even have to be on the web
server). You should be able to find plenty of free ones of these.

http://home.snafu.de/tilman/xenulink.html
http://tucows.com/Windows/Developmen...ng/Validators/

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 06 Apr 2006, 10:53 am
jmattis@attglobal.net
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: More updates to the Unofficial FAQ

That was quite diplomatically stated. I'll take any good info I can
get, however, and appreciate the efforts. Like everything Internet,
it's the reader's job to decide if it is "good info."

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 06 Apr 2006, 10:59 am
Elle
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: More updates to the Unofficial FAQ

<jmattis@attglobal.net> wrote
> I'll take any good info I can
> get, however, and appreciate the efforts. Like everything
> Internet,
> it's the reader's job to decide if it is "good info."


Right. Plus, AFAIC Tegger's FAQ site does overwhelming good.


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 07 Apr 2006, 12:40 pm
Matt Ion
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: More updates to the Unofficial FAQ

Bucky wrote:
> TeGGeR® wrote:
>
>>I also found a few broken internal links. How come nobody notifies me of
>>these things?

>
>
> There's free tools that can scan your site for broken links. You should
> look into those. I haven't used one before, so I can't recommend one.


I still say a Wiki backend would make this all easier... yes yes, I know
the argument about anyone-can-edit-it... that's why you use one that
allows only the administrator or specified contributors to edit it,
and/or requires the admin to approve updates.


---
avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean.
Virus Database (VPS): 0614-3, 04/07/2006
Tested on: 4/7/2006 10:40:16 AM
avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2005 ALWIL Software.
http://www.avast.com



Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 07 Apr 2006, 05:21 pm
Ice
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: More updates to the Unofficial FAQ

Boy, Who pissed in your Cornflakes today?

"Elle" <honda.lioness@nospam.earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:kWUYf.12067$Bj7.7703@newsread2.news.pas.earth link.net...
> "TeGGeR®" <tegger@tegger.c0m> wrote
>> I also found a few broken internal links. How come nobody
>> notifies me of
>> these things?

>
> Perhaps because there are things even more important than
> broken links with which people have objections. Agreeing to
> disagree is often the best way to go with you, along with a lot
> of patience (or just ignoring you) when you go into the mode,
> "My way is the best way. I can't prove it. But it is."
>
> Thus my silence on your latest page.
>



Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
More updates to the Unofficial FAQ TeGGeR® Honda 3 1 28 Oct 2005 08:43 pm
More updates to the Unofficial FAQ TeGGeR® Acura 0 20 Sep 2005 01:51 pm
More updates to the Unofficial FAQ TeGGeR® Acura 2 26 Apr 2005 07:14 pm
More updates to the Unofficial FAQ TeGGeR® Honda 2 2 26 Apr 2005 07:14 pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:47 am.


Attribution:
Honda News | Autoblog
Powered by Yahoo Answers

Archive: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456



Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.3.2 © 2009, Crawlability, Inc.
HondaCarForum.com is not affiliated with Honda Motor Company in any way. Honda Motor Company does not sponsor, support, or endorse HondaCarForum.com in any way. Copyright/trademark/sales mark infringements are not intended or implied.