Honda Car Forum


 

Go Back   Honda Car Forum - Accord Parts Civic Tuning Acura Racing > Honda Acura > Honda 2


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 28 Nov 2005, 06:01 pm
T L via CarKB.com
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Timing belt snappage on 99 civic CONTINUED

Hi all,

Posted a few days about my sister's 99 civic non vtec. She broke the t-belt,
and the dealership put it back together.

Well it runs, but no compression on Cylinder 3. The shop recommends an
engine replacement since the labour to get the head off and mill it and
replace the damaged components is excessive. Before you get all excited,
this is what they said:

All prices in Canadian $$
$695 for a used motor with 131000kms on it

1200 labour for the install.

VERSUS

$1000 labour for removal of the head and respective components
$200 for parts (valves. seals, head gasket and other junk for cylinder 3)
$500 to send the head to a shop for machining.

Here are my questions:

1. How hard would it be to take the head off and replace the valves in
Cylinder 3?

2. Do I have to get all of the seats machined?

3. Can I inspect the valve seats once the head is removed and make the call
then as to whether they need to be machined at all?

I do have the Honda shop manual, it doesn't look that bad.

Feedback please. What am I missing here?

t

--
Message posted via CarKB.com
http://www.carkb.com/Uwe/Forums.aspx...-cars/200511/1
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 28 Nov 2005, 06:50 pm
T L via CarKB.com
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Timing belt snappage on 99 civic CONTINUED

Based on some of the research I have done today I see the following as
possible courses of action:

1. Repair the head - hopefully the damage is not that bad, and its only a
valve that needs to be replaced.

2. Replace the head - If I can find a replacement head for the motor, I
could just swap them. Are the heads different on different model years
between 96 and 00?

3. Replace the motor- I found a motor for $600 - 800 canadian. Haven't
negotiated yet, but this could be viable as well.

What does everyone think?
t

T L wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>Posted a few days about my sister's 99 civic non vtec. She broke the t-belt,
>and the dealership put it back together.
>
>Well it runs, but no compression on Cylinder 3. The shop recommends an
>engine replacement since the labour to get the head off and mill it and
>replace the damaged components is excessive. Before you get all excited,
>this is what they said:
>
>All prices in Canadian $$
>$695 for a used motor with 131000kms on it
>
>1200 labour for the install.
>
>VERSUS
>
>$1000 labour for removal of the head and respective components
>$200 for parts (valves. seals, head gasket and other junk for cylinder 3)
>$500 to send the head to a shop for machining.
>
>Here are my questions:
>
>1. How hard would it be to take the head off and replace the valves in
>Cylinder 3?
>
>2. Do I have to get all of the seats machined?
>
>3. Can I inspect the valve seats once the head is removed and make the call
>then as to whether they need to be machined at all?
>
>I do have the Honda shop manual, it doesn't look that bad.
>
>Feedback please. What am I missing here?
>
>t


--
Message posted via CarKB.com
http://www.carkb.com/Uwe/Forums.aspx...-cars/200511/1
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 28 Nov 2005, 07:09 pm
Jim Yanik
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Timing belt snappage on 99 civic CONTINUED

"T L via CarKB.com" <u10197@uwe> wrote in news:580e9e5c5abac@uwe:

> Hi all,
>
> Posted a few days about my sister's 99 civic non vtec. She broke the
> t-belt, and the dealership put it back together.
>
> Well it runs, but no compression on Cylinder 3. The shop recommends
> an engine replacement since the labour to get the head off and mill it
> and replace the damaged components is excessive. Before you get all
> excited, this is what they said:
>
> All prices in Canadian $$
> $695 for a used motor with 131000kms on it
>
> 1200 labour for the install.
>
> VERSUS
>
> $1000 labour for removal of the head and respective components
> $200 for parts (valves. seals, head gasket and other junk for cylinder
> 3) $500 to send the head to a shop for machining.
>
> Here are my questions:
>
> 1. How hard would it be to take the head off and replace the valves in
> Cylinder 3?
>
> 2. Do I have to get all of the seats machined?
>
> 3. Can I inspect the valve seats once the head is removed and make the
> call then as to whether they need to be machined at all?
>
> I do have the Honda shop manual, it doesn't look that bad.
>
> Feedback please. What am I missing here?
>
> t
>


Why couldn't you just get a head from a junkyard motor?

--
Jim Yanik
jyanik
at
kua.net
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 28 Nov 2005, 07:54 pm
Eric
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Timing belt snappage on 99 civic CONTINUED

"T L via CarKB.com" wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Posted a few days about my sister's 99 civic non vtec. She broke the
> t-belt, and the dealership put it back together.
>
> Well it runs, but no compression on Cylinder 3. The shop recommends an
> engine replacement since the labour to get the head off and mill it and
> replace the damaged components is excessive. Before you get all excited,
> this is what they said:
>
> All prices in Canadian $$
> $695 for a used motor with 131000kms on it
>
> 1200 labour for the install.
>
> VERSUS
>
> $1000 labour for removal of the head and respective components
> $200 for parts (valves. seals, head gasket and other junk for cylinder 3)
> $500 to send the head to a shop for machining.
>
> Here are my questions:
>
> 1. How hard would it be to take the head off and replace the valves in
> Cylinder 3?
>
> 2. Do I have to get all of the seats machined?
>
> 3. Can I inspect the valve seats once the head is removed and make the
> call then as to whether they need to be machined at all?
>
> I do have the Honda shop manual, it doesn't look that bad.
>
> Feedback please. What am I missing here?


The information below is from a recent post mine dated 10/31 under the
subject Re: 89 Honda Prelude...
_________________________________
Claudio wrote:
>
> Once my timimg belt broke on my 89 Prelude, my valves got damaged. Im
> looking for a engine, or a rebuilt head in the Quebec, Canada area. I'm a
> student in High school, so I don't have allot of money. Luckly my father
> will do all the repairs, but it's up to me to come up if all the parts. I
> need help.......
>


If the rest of the engine is in good condition, e.g., it doesn't burn oil,
then just pull the head and replace the bent valves. There's usually no
need to replace the head. Note that you will need to lap the new valves in
to make sure that they seat well (be exceedingly meticulous about removing
all traces of lapping compound afterward). Also note these older engines
have a peculiar problem when the head is pulled. That is, they often start
burning oil afterwards. It's believed that this is due to the crud in the
piston ring grooves drying out and preventing the rings from seating
correctly. The best way to avoid this is to put a small amount of ATF in
the cylinders to cover the top of the pistons once you remove the head.
This will keep things from drying out. Be sure to remove the ATF from the
piston tops before the head is reinstalled. You should also consider
replacing the valve stem seals when you have the head off. Only use Honda's
OEM seals if you want to avoid problems further down the road.

By the way, when you replace the timing belt, it's a good idea to also
replace the water pump, timing belt tensioner bearing, and cam & front crank
seals. The front seal can be a pain in the ass at best to replace. The
best way to do this is to cut out a rectangle from a clean plastic pop
bottle and use it as a sleeve wrapped around the seal journal of the
crankshaft. Slide the seal over the sleeve (make sure that there's grease
on the inner lip) and remove the sleeve. Then get a flat washer that's
about the same size as the seal and use it as a seal driver to carefully tap
the seal into its bore with a hammer and punch. Tap the washer gently
holding the washer against the seal and be sure not to get the seal
crooked. Note that if you tap directly against the seal, then you will
damage it. This is nearly unavoidable, that's why I always use some type of
seal driver. Honda makes seal drivers specifically for this purpose but
they're a bit expensive. I've found that a large flat washer (usually
called a "machine washer" at the hardware store) will suffice as a
substitute. Lastly, the cam seal is less of a pain but you should also use
the plastic sleeve. After you get the cam seal into position, it can
usually just be pushed into its correct position by hand (for example by
carefully using the blunt end of a socket extension bar and there's no need
to tap it in with a hammer).

One final thought, a factory service manual for your car can be obtained
from http://www.helminc.com. It's a great investment especially since you
plan to be doing so much work on your vehicle.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 28 Nov 2005, 11:22 pm
jim beam
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Timing belt snappage on 99 civic CONTINUED

T L via CarKB.com wrote:
> Based on some of the research I have done today I see the following as
> possible courses of action:
>
> 1. Repair the head - hopefully the damage is not that bad, and its only a
> valve that needs to be replaced.


my preference

>
> 2. Replace the head - If I can find a replacement head for the motor, I
> could just swap them. Are the heads different on different model years
> between 96 and 00?


think they're identical. best check.

>
> 3. Replace the motor- I found a motor for $600 - 800 canadian. Haven't
> negotiated yet, but this could be viable as well.


last resort. if the "interference" between the piston crowns and the
valves is sufficient to damage the pistons, replacement may well be a
more cost effective solution than rebuilding the damaged motor. but
exhaust your other options first.

>
> What does everyone think?
> t
>
> T L wrote:
>
>>Hi all,
>>
>>Posted a few days about my sister's 99 civic non vtec. She broke the t-belt,
>>and the dealership put it back together.
>>
>>Well it runs, but no compression on Cylinder 3. The shop recommends an
>>engine replacement since the labour to get the head off and mill it and
>>replace the damaged components is excessive. Before you get all excited,
>>this is what they said:
>>
>>All prices in Canadian $$
>>$695 for a used motor with 131000kms on it
>>
>>1200 labour for the install.
>>
>>VERSUS
>>
>>$1000 labour for removal of the head and respective components
>>$200 for parts (valves. seals, head gasket and other junk for cylinder 3)
>>$500 to send the head to a shop for machining.
>>
>>Here are my questions:
>>
>>1. How hard would it be to take the head off and replace the valves in
>>Cylinder 3?
>>
>>2. Do I have to get all of the seats machined?
>>
>>3. Can I inspect the valve seats once the head is removed and make the call
>>then as to whether they need to be machined at all?
>>
>>I do have the Honda shop manual, it doesn't look that bad.
>>
>>Feedback please. What am I missing here?
>>
>>t

>
>

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 28 Nov 2005, 11:42 pm
T L via CarKB.com
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Timing belt snappage on 99 civic CONTINUED

Checked, they come with the motor.

Jim Yanik wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>

>[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
>>
>> t

>
>Why couldn't you just get a head from a junkyard motor?
>


--
Message posted via CarKB.com
http://www.carkb.com/Uwe/Forums.aspx...-cars/200511/1
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 29 Nov 2005, 10:22 am
Burt S.
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Timing belt snappage on 99 civic CONTINUED

"T L via CarKB.com" <u10197@uwe> wrote in message news:580e9e5c5abac@uwe...

> Posted a few days about my sister's 99 civic non vtec. She broke the t-belt,
> and the dealership put it back together.
> Well it runs, but no compression on Cylinder 3. The shop recommends an
> engine replacement since the labour to get the head off and mill it and
> replace the damaged components is excessive. Before you get all excited,
> this is what they said:
> All prices in Canadian $$
> $695 for a used motor with 131000kms on it
> 1200 labour for the install.
> VERSUS
> $1000 labour for removal of the head and respective components
> $200 for parts (valves. seals, head gasket and other junk for cylinder 3)
> $500 to send the head to a shop for machining.
> Here are my questions:
> 1. How hard would it be to take the head off and replace the valves in
> Cylinder 3?


> 2. Do I have to get all of the seats machined?


Machining all of them would also help equalize the
compression and improve smooth idle... it's your call.





Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
timing belt for 98 civic MG Honda 2 4 08 Apr 2006 09:07 pm
Timing belt snappage on 99 civic T L via CarKB.com Honda 2 16 28 Nov 2005 02:09 am
Civic Timing Belt Saga - Continued disallow Honda 3 4 17 Nov 2004 02:44 pm
Civic Timing Belt Saga - Continued disallow Honda 2 6 15 Nov 2004 03:04 pm
timing belt on Civic '97, 62k l-talk Honda 2 5 06 Oct 2004 07:36 am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:47 am.


Attribution:
Honda News | Autoblog
Powered by Yahoo Answers

Archive: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458



Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.3.2 © 2009, Crawlability, Inc.
HondaCarForum.com is not affiliated with Honda Motor Company in any way. Honda Motor Company does not sponsor, support, or endorse HondaCarForum.com in any way. Copyright/trademark/sales mark infringements are not intended or implied.