Honda Car Forum


 

Go Back   Honda Car Forum - Accord Parts Civic Tuning Acura Racing > Honda Acura > Honda 2


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 16 Nov 2005, 05:32 pm
Chris
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Accord suspension "Ker plunk!"

Ciao e tutti,

Ref. '93 Accord 2.2 4WS (UK version) 80,000 miles

Both my left & right front suspension are making serious "ker-plunk" when
the suspension is de-compressed e.g. when encountering a pot-hole or on
the down-side of a speed-hump. This is worse on cold mornings. Driver-
side is nosiest.

I have had various suggestions to replace:

1/ Suspension units & (all) bushes
2/ TOP SUSPENSION ARM + BALL JOINT+BUSHES
3/ Front Suspension Link Kit (I don't know what this is)
4/ All of the above

What do we think?
Also is any of this DIY? Sounds a bit serious to me.

Thanks in advance

--
Chris Notton
Replace "nospam" with my surname to reply by email
Sostituisca il "nospam" con il mio cognome per rispondere
}<////(*>
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 16 Nov 2005, 11:11 pm
Eric
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Accord suspension "Ker plunk!"

Chris wrote:
>
> Ciao e tutti,
>
> Ref. '93 Accord 2.2 4WS (UK version) 80,000 miles
>
> Both my left & right front suspension are making serious "ker-plunk" when
> the suspension is de-compressed e.g. when encountering a pot-hole or on
> the down-side of a speed-hump. This is worse on cold mornings. Driver-
> side is nosiest.
>
> I have had various suggestions to replace:
>
> 1/ Suspension units & (all) bushes
> 2/ TOP SUSPENSION ARM + BALL JOINT+BUSHES
> 3/ Front Suspension Link Kit (I don't know what this is)
> 4/ All of the above
>
> What do we think?
> Also is any of this DIY? Sounds a bit serious to me.
>
> Thanks in advance


It would be extremely difficult to tell exactly without performing a
physical inspection first. Has any of the above advice you've received
resulted from a physical inspection or are they just knowledgeable
hypotheses?

Eric
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 18 Nov 2005, 07:21 pm
Chris
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Accord suspension "Ker plunk!"

In article <437C02D4.2F7B7ADF@spam.now>, say.no@spam.now says...
> Chris wrote:
> >
> > Ciao e tutti,
> >
> > Ref. '93 Accord 2.2 4WS (UK version) 80,000 miles
> >
> > Both my left & right front suspension are making serious "ker-plunk" when

snip
> > Thanks in advance

>
> It would be extremely difficult to tell exactly without performing a
> physical inspection first. Has any of the above advice you've received
> resulted from a physical inspection or are they just knowledgeable
> hypotheses?
>
> Eric
>

Hi,
It's just passed it's MOT without a mention of anything worn. Apparentlyy
nothing is visible on a ramp. I am told that dismantling is the next
diagnostic stage. I was just hoping it was a common fault at a certain
age or mileage. All suspension parts are original as far as we can tell.

Thanks for your input.

Pip pip


--
Chris Notton
Replace "nospam" with my surname to reply by email
Sostituisca il "nospam" con il mio cognome per rispondere
}<////(*>
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 18 Nov 2005, 11:38 pm
mlpogue@canoemail.com
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Accord suspension "Ker plunk!"

On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 22:32:13 -0000, Chris <chris@nospam.net> wrote:

>Ciao e tutti,
>
>Ref. '93 Accord 2.2 4WS (UK version) 80,000 miles
>
>Both my left & right front suspension are making serious "ker-plunk" when
>the suspension is de-compressed e.g. when encountering a pot-hole or on
>the down-side of a speed-hump. This is worse on cold mornings. Driver-
>side is nosiest.
>
>I have had various suggestions to replace:
>
>1/ Suspension units & (all) bushes
>2/ TOP SUSPENSION ARM + BALL JOINT+BUSHES
>3/ Front Suspension Link Kit (I don't know what this is)
>4/ All of the above
>
>What do we think?
>Also is any of this DIY? Sounds a bit serious to me.
>
>Thanks in advance



Does your car have coil springs? I have silenced ker plunk sounds on
my '93 Accord on two occasions by replacing broken coils. They both
broke higher up on the coil, and the breaks aren't real noticeable
without a close look. Both front springs broke on different occasions.
I don't recall the exact mileage, but one was well before 200,000 kms

My two cents or should that be two pence
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 19 Nov 2005, 08:00 pm
Eric
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Accord suspension "Ker plunk!"

Chris wrote:
>
> > It would be extremely difficult to tell exactly without performing a
> > physical inspection first. Has any of the above advice you've received
> > resulted from a physical inspection or are they just knowledgeable
> > hypotheses?
> >
> > Eric
> >

> Hi,
> It's just passed it's MOT without a mention of anything worn. Apparentlyy
> nothing is visible on a ramp. I am told that dismantling is the next
> diagnostic stage. I was just hoping it was a common fault at a certain
> age or mileage. All suspension parts are original as far as we can tell.
>
> Thanks for your input.
>


There are many suspension checks that cannot be performed when the
suspension is loaded by having the tires on ramps as you have described
above. A competent mechanic will use devices such as a large prybar and a
large set of ChannelLock pliers to test the various suspension joints and
bushings for free play. In addition, it is also quite common to grab the
tire and rock it back and forth in a few different orientations designed to
reveal looseness in certain parts, e.g. upper and lower ball joints, wheel
bearing, and the tie rod. Again, none of these checks can be performed when
the suspension is loaded with the tires on ramps. If this was indeed the
protocol that was followed during your recent inspection, then I would
suggest that the results were inconclusive at best.

Eric
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 25 Nov 2005, 10:33 am
nospam
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Accord suspension "Ker plunk!"

Our 1990 Accord has 188k miles, no suspension parts replaced except struts
at 67K. I get a steady vibration and a lot of "road feel" in the steering
at any speed. Vibration steadies out in the 70s mph range, more predominant
at slower speeds. Looking to rebuild front end, replace struts.

Do I replace bushings in upper and lower control arms or replace the entire
assemblies?

Also radius rod bushings, replace or ignore?

Best question, what should be replaced and what should be left alone? Yes,
I know I'm asking for armchair diagnostics.

Next best question, best internet sources for good CHEAP OEM parts?

Thanks.

Don

"Eric" <say.no@spam.now> wrote in message news:437FCA98.EC33AAB8@spam.now...
> Chris wrote:
>>
>> > It would be extremely difficult to tell exactly without performing a
>> > physical inspection first. Has any of the above advice you've received
>> > resulted from a physical inspection or are they just knowledgeable
>> > hypotheses?
>> >
>> > Eric
>> >

>> Hi,
>> It's just passed it's MOT without a mention of anything worn. Apparentlyy
>> nothing is visible on a ramp. I am told that dismantling is the next
>> diagnostic stage. I was just hoping it was a common fault at a certain
>> age or mileage. All suspension parts are original as far as we can tell.
>>
>> Thanks for your input.
>>

>
> There are many suspension checks that cannot be performed when the
> suspension is loaded by having the tires on ramps as you have described
> above. A competent mechanic will use devices such as a large prybar and a
> large set of ChannelLock pliers to test the various suspension joints and
> bushings for free play. In addition, it is also quite common to grab the
> tire and rock it back and forth in a few different orientations designed
> to
> reveal looseness in certain parts, e.g. upper and lower ball joints, wheel
> bearing, and the tie rod. Again, none of these checks can be performed
> when
> the suspension is loaded with the tires on ramps. If this was indeed the
> protocol that was followed during your recent inspection, then I would
> suggest that the results were inconclusive at best.
>
> Eric



Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Accord 1999 - battery "tested" 209 CCA, "Replace!"? Why? bwooster47@gmail.com Honda 3 11 08 Mar 2007 11:42 pm
">"">>>><meta http-equiv="Refresh" content="0;url=http://www.YapaYHaCK.OrG/Hacked.htm SaNaLKorSaN Acura 0 17 Nov 2006 07:28 am
Accord suspension "Ker plunk!" Chris Honda 3 4 25 Nov 2005 10:33 am
92' Accord 5spd has "knocking"-"cluncking" sound on drivers sidewhen starting out FWD and BKWD phil Honda 2 1 12 Feb 2005 11:29 am
92 Accord LX 5spd Intermittent start..replaced starter and now stillget the "CLICK" "CLICK" when turning key. It eventually starts ..Anythingspecial to check ? phil Honda 2 5 24 Dec 2004 11:09 pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:50 am.


Attribution:
Honda News | Autoblog
Powered by Yahoo Answers

Archive: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456



Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.3.2 © 2009, Crawlability, Inc.
HondaCarForum.com is not affiliated with Honda Motor Company in any way. Honda Motor Company does not sponsor, support, or endorse HondaCarForum.com in any way. Copyright/trademark/sales mark infringements are not intended or implied.