Honda Car Forum | |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Honda Parts Search |
|
| ||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
'94 Honda Accord Station Wagon. Currently 120,000 miles.
Owner's manual states that the timing belt should be replaced at 140,000 miles. Then, through a subscript, it says "Recommended Only" What is the meaning of this phrase (Recommended Only). Seriously, everything in the maintenance schedule is a "recommendation", in my opinion. Is this really a fabric belt that "must" be replaced before it breaks, or, is it a metal chain that stretches and is "recommended" to be replaced when the automatic tensioner is beyond function due to excessive stretch. All comments appreciated. Needless to say, the local mechanic claims that the belt should have been replaced at 60k miles and every 60k miles thereafter. Ivan Vegvary |
|
|||
|
Ivan Vegvary wrote:
> '94 Honda Accord Station Wagon. Currently 120,000 miles. > Owner's manual states that the timing belt should be replaced at 140,000 > miles. it's replace at 140k KILOMETERS not miles. you're overdue by 30k. > Then, through a subscript, it says "Recommended Only" > > What is the meaning of this phrase (Recommended Only). Seriously, > everything in the maintenance schedule is a "recommendation", in my opinion. yeah, it's only a recommendation, but one that can save you upwards of $2k. your call on the economics of deferral. > > Is this really a fabric belt that "must" be replaced before it breaks, or, > is it a metal chain that stretches and is "recommended" to be replaced when > the automatic tensioner is beyond function due to excessive stretch. it's a fiber reinforced toothed rubber belt. it doesn't stretch, it just fatigues & breaks. > > All comments appreciated. !!! you'll get a few more than me i'm sure. > > Needless to say, the local mechanic claims that the belt should have been > replaced at 60k miles and every 60k miles thereafter. 60k miles is premature unless using inferior aftermarket parts. > > Ivan Vegvary > > |
|
|||
|
Ivan Vegvary wrote:
> > '94 Honda Accord Station Wagon. Currently 120,000 miles. > Owner's manual states that the timing belt should be replaced at 140,000 > miles. Then, through a subscript, it says "Recommended Only" > -------------------------- You're overdue by about 5 years. TIME is just as important as mileage. Start carrying a Peach basket in the back of your station wagon . . http://www.tegger.com/hondafaq/faq.html#interference 'Curly' |
|
|||
|
"'Curly Q. Links'" <motsco__@interbaun.com> wrote in message news:4379607F.A93EA44A@interbaun.com...
> Start carrying a Peach basket in the back of your station wagon . . If the "peach-basket" implies that the owner has to pick up his engine parts off half a mile of road and bring them into the shop in a peach basket, that is untrue. I've broken my Honda timing belts once. The only time I had to go collect my parts on the road is when the parts remain useful. I lost a connecting rod caps and bearings once - didn't bother to retrieve them because each part traveled 50-ft per second and DISAPPEARED in my rear view mirror. Here's a Nantucket Peach Basket and a one for only 99 pennies at ebay! http://www.riverhillpottery.com/Images/gallery/37lg.jpg http://www.jymm.com/baskets/walnut.jpg http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...category=45472 |
|
|||
|
Thanks for the replies, everybody!!
Guess I'll be tearing into that timing belt real soon. Ivan Vegvary "Ivan Vegvary" <ivan@reelart.us> wrote in message news:nXbef.18342$Mr4.14158@trnddc08... > '94 Honda Accord Station Wagon. Currently 120,000 miles. > Owner's manual states that the timing belt should be replaced at 140,000 > miles. Then, through a subscript, it says "Recommended Only" > > What is the meaning of this phrase (Recommended Only). Seriously, > everything in the maintenance schedule is a "recommendation", in my > opinion. > > Is this really a fabric belt that "must" be replaced before it breaks, or, > is it a metal chain that stretches and is "recommended" to be replaced > when the automatic tensioner is beyond function due to excessive stretch. > > All comments appreciated. > > Needless to say, the local mechanic claims that the belt should have been > replaced at 60k miles and every 60k miles thereafter. > > Ivan Vegvary > |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1995 Honda Passport - Timing Belt Tension Question | AJPDLA | Honda 1 | 2 | 29 Jun 2006 04:44 pm |
| 1995 Honda Passport - Timing Belt Tension Question | AJPDLA | Honda 2 | 2 | 29 Jun 2006 04:44 pm |
| timing belt question... | qslim | Honda 3 | 1 | 14 Nov 2004 10:20 pm |
| Timiing Belt change 2000 Honda Odyssey ? | nospam4me@nospam.com | Honda 3 | 1 | 30 Aug 2004 09:16 pm |
| Tming belt question | Peer Lovell | Acura | 7 | 23 Jan 2004 11:28 pm |