Honda Car Forum


 

Go Back   Honda Car Forum - Accord Parts Civic Tuning Acura Racing > Honda Acura > Honda 2


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 26 Oct 2005, 11:11 am
ECUguy
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default igniter testing

I was looking thru teggar's igniter (ignition module) test and noticed
a contradiction in reference on this line, "The igniter... will only switch
off when grounded, but not when Terminal 4 is floating." is
contradicting with the service manual.

http://www.tegger.com/hondafaq/ignit...r-testing.html

The 90 Prelude service manual (link below) says, "If the WHT wire
[comparable to Terminal 4] is shorted the igniter may be damaged"
needs some explanations why a short will damage the igniter.

http://www.imagesharing.com/files/90...gniteryrit.gif

Note that a 90 prelude igniter has three terminals and a ground.
Coil/Battery/ECU and ground.

The service manual seems to imply that a ground short may
damage the igniter, although Hondas are known as electronic
ground safe vehicles, such that accidental grounding of circuits
isn't likely to be harmful. Already, the ECU grounds terminal 4
to produce a spark so why bother. Ground or not, the question
still stands. Should grounding terminal 4 on a standard 4
terminal igniter (ignition module) cause damage?









Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 26 Oct 2005, 01:42 pm
Michael Pardee
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: igniter testing

"ECUguy" <ECUguy@none.com> wrote in message
news:GUN7f.18837$6e1.6771@newssvr14.news.prodigy.c om...
>I was looking thru teggar's igniter (ignition module) test and noticed
> a contradiction in reference on this line, "The igniter... will only
> switch
> off when grounded, but not when Terminal 4 is floating." is
> contradicting with the service manual.
>
> http://www.tegger.com/hondafaq/ignit...r-testing.html
>
> The 90 Prelude service manual (link below) says, "If the WHT wire
> [comparable to Terminal 4] is shorted the igniter may be damaged"
> needs some explanations why a short will damage the igniter.
>
> http://www.imagesharing.com/files/90...gniteryrit.gif
>
> Note that a 90 prelude igniter has three terminals and a ground.
> Coil/Battery/ECU and ground.
>
> The service manual seems to imply that a ground short may
> damage the igniter, although Hondas are known as electronic
> ground safe vehicles, such that accidental grounding of circuits
> isn't likely to be harmful. Already, the ECU grounds terminal 4
> to produce a spark so why bother. Ground or not, the question
> still stands. Should grounding terminal 4 on a standard 4
> terminal igniter (ignition module) cause damage?
>
>

Just my guess - TeGGeR is right and the manual is not as right ;-)

TeGGeR has had a lot of input that he sorted through, so I doubt he missed
something so important. Manuals have been known to have glitches. There is
also the possibility the warning didn't apply to a short to ground, but to
other random places.

Mike


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 26 Oct 2005, 09:05 pm
jim beam
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: igniter testing

ECUguy wrote:
> I was looking thru teggar's igniter (ignition module) test and noticed
> a contradiction in reference on this line, "The igniter... will only switch
> off when grounded, but not when Terminal 4 is floating." is
> contradicting with the service manual.
>
> http://www.tegger.com/hondafaq/ignit...r-testing.html
>
> The 90 Prelude service manual (link below) says, "If the WHT wire
> [comparable to Terminal 4] is shorted the igniter may be damaged"
> needs some explanations why a short will damage the igniter.
>
> http://www.imagesharing.com/files/90...gniteryrit.gif
>
> Note that a 90 prelude igniter has three terminals and a ground.
> Coil/Battery/ECU and ground.
>
> The service manual seems to imply that a ground short may
> damage the igniter, although Hondas are known as electronic
> ground safe vehicles, such that accidental grounding of circuits
> isn't likely to be harmful. Already, the ECU grounds terminal 4
> to produce a spark so why bother. Ground or not, the question
> still stands. Should grounding terminal 4 on a standard 4
> terminal igniter (ignition module) cause damage?
>


not in my experience. i tested a civic igniter unit this way last
weekend and it worked fine. no damage that i could tell. don't know if
there's any difference between the prelude & civic igniters, but it
worked for me!

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 27 Oct 2005, 06:25 am
r2000swler@hotmail.com
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: igniter testing


ECUguy wrote:
> I was looking thru teggar's igniter (ignition module) test and noticed
> a contradiction in reference on this line, "The igniter... will only switch
> off when grounded, but not when Terminal 4 is floating." is
> contradicting with the service manual.
>
> http://www.tegger.com/hondafaq/ignit...r-testing.html
>
> The 90 Prelude service manual (link below) says, "If the WHT wire
> [comparable to Terminal 4] is shorted the igniter may be damaged"
> needs some explanations why a short will damage the igniter.
>
> http://www.imagesharing.com/files/90...gniteryrit.gif
>
> Note that a 90 prelude igniter has three terminals and a ground.
> Coil/Battery/ECU and ground.
>
> The service manual seems to imply that a ground short may
> damage the igniter, although Hondas are known as electronic
> ground safe vehicles, such that accidental grounding of circuits
> isn't likely to be harmful. Already, the ECU grounds terminal 4
> to produce a spark so why bother. Ground or not, the question
> still stands. Should grounding terminal 4 on a standard 4
> terminal igniter (ignition module) cause damage?

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++=
The Civic ECM/ECM (computer) pulls the igniter down to within the
saturation voltage of a NPN power transistor. Less then .2V Not
theory measured with a good 'scope during operation. I have trouble
accepting that a short to ground would harm anything. This applies
to the 1990-1991 civics. I suspect that other Hondas would be very
similar.

Terry

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 27 Oct 2005, 05:29 pm
TeGGeR®
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: igniter testing

"ECUguy" <ECUguy@none.com> wrote in
news:GUN7f.18837$6e1.6771@newssvr14.news.prodigy.c om:

> I was looking thru teggar's igniter (ignition module) test and noticed
> a contradiction in reference on this line, "The igniter... will only
> switch off when grounded, but not when Terminal 4 is floating." is
> contradicting with the service manual.
>
> http://www.tegger.com/hondafaq/ignit...r-testing.html
>
> The 90 Prelude service manual (link below) says, "If the WHT wire
> [comparable to Terminal 4] is shorted the igniter may be damaged"
> needs some explanations why a short will damage the igniter.
>
> http://www.imagesharing.com/files/90...gniteryrit.gif
>
> Note that a 90 prelude igniter has three terminals and a ground.
> Coil/Battery/ECU and ground.




The igniter on my test page has those connections as well.
I think all newer Honda igniters are basically the same.


>
> The service manual seems to imply that a ground short may
> damage the igniter, although Hondas are known as electronic
> ground safe vehicles, such that accidental grounding of circuits
> isn't likely to be harmful. Already, the ECU grounds terminal 4
> to produce a spark so why bother. Ground or not, the question
> still stands. Should grounding terminal 4 on a standard 4
> terminal igniter (ignition module) cause damage?
>
>
>




Whether that wire was actually a ground or whether it was
something else was a subject of considerable debate
in the Honda groups a while ago. The consensus ended up being
that it was much more than a ground, hence my diagram.

Adding fuel to the fire was a diagram I came across
from the Rover Group in Britain, which built Hondas for a while
under license. It too showed that wire as a ground.

The thread that discussed this can be found here, for those
who wish to peer-review:
<http://groups.google.com/group/rec.autos.makers.honda/browse_frm/thread/bd92f7b580f0123e/b9ac5523075dc869?lnk=st&q=group:rec.autos.makers.h onda+insubject:ignition+insubject:updates+insubjec t:to+insubject:the+insubject:unofficial+insubject: faq&rnum=1&hl=en#b9ac5523075dc869>

Since all that started, I received two private emails
from individuals wishing to test their igniters off the car.
I had not posted the test page at that point, so simply sent them my
raw photos and text. They were both able to perform the test
to determine that their igniters had indeed gone bad. One had a
hard-on failure (sorry, Viagra won't fix it), one a hard-off.
This leads me to believe that the diagrams and instructions
are correct as written, so I don't think I ought to change
the page.

I can only surmise that Honda simplified the white wire's
advertised function for the purposes of the manual.

--
TeGGeR®

The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
igniter Steph Honda 3 5 25 Apr 2006 09:21 pm
EPA mpg testing Bucky Honda 3 3 15 Apr 2005 08:42 pm
testing Neal Hudson Acura 0 19 Mar 2005 09:03 pm
igniter testing jim beam Honda 3 3 09 Nov 2004 01:03 pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:40 pm.


Attribution:
Honda News | Autoblog
Powered by Yahoo Answers

Archive: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457



Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.3.2 © 2009, Crawlability, Inc.
HondaCarForum.com is not affiliated with Honda Motor Company in any way. Honda Motor Company does not sponsor, support, or endorse HondaCarForum.com in any way. Copyright/trademark/sales mark infringements are not intended or implied.