Honda Car Forum


 

Go Back   Honda Car Forum - Accord Parts Civic Tuning Acura Racing > Honda Acura > Honda 2


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 23 Aug 2005, 10:21 am
Michael Selin
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default s2000

Hi
Anyone out there have any big complaints or comments about the Honda s2000.
I am close to going for one over a more pratical WRX si or EVO.
PS: I am old and drive like an old fart most of the time, but who can
resist a re visit to the speed of the mid 1960's


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 23 Aug 2005, 10:51 am
T L via CarKB.com
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: s2000

My impression of the S2000 is that if you want power and speed out of that
motor, you really gotta rev it high. It redlines at like 9500rpms.

Michael Selin wrote:
>Hi
>Anyone out there have any big complaints or comments about the Honda s2000.
>I am close to going for one over a more pratical WRX si or EVO.
>PS: I am old and drive like an old fart most of the time, but who can
>resist a re visit to the speed of the mid 1960's



--
Message posted via CarKB.com
http://www.carkb.com/Uwe/Forums.aspx...-cars/200508/1
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 23 Aug 2005, 01:47 pm
Enrico Fermi
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: s2000


"Michael Selin" <mselin@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:Q9HOe.659485$cg1.564304@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> Hi
> Anyone out there have any big complaints or comments about the Honda
> s2000.
> I am close to going for one over a more pratical WRX si or EVO.
> PS: I am old and drive like an old fart most of the time, but who can
> resist a re visit to the speed of the mid 1960's

It's like Car & Driver's April fool's review of the FMC Log Skidder, "the
ride is rough but the seat is hard". The S2000 is difficult to compare to
almost any other sports car. The chassis is superb for a rag-top and its
price, the engine screams over 5000 rpm (and is lethargic below) and the
build quality can't be beat. The problem is (IMHO) that it is too much
automobile for dawdling around town; it belongs on a race track. I'm old as
well and prefer the modern MR2. A Miata is OK if you don't have long legs.
The big plus with the S2000 is that it is a high-status ride. Your friends
will envy you even as they have concluded that you've lost your mind How
about a '59 TR3?
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/1959-...QQcmdZViewItem


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 23 Aug 2005, 02:53 pm
lab~rat
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: s2000

On Tue, 23 Aug 2005 15:21:20 GMT, "Michael Selin"
<mselin@worldnet.att.net> puked:

>Hi
>Anyone out there have any big complaints or comments about the Honda s2000.
>I am close to going for one over a more pratical WRX si or EVO.
>PS: I am old and drive like an old fart most of the time, but who can
>resist a re visit to the speed of the mid 1960's
>


I've driven one and like it. Ergonomically it fits me well. I have
been toying with the idea with buying one and the only real issue I
have is that it is 100% made in Japan.

Maybe I'll buy a used one that's a year old?
--
lab~rat >:-)
Do you want polite or do you want sincere?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 23 Aug 2005, 04:12 pm
flobert
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: s2000

On Tue, 23 Aug 2005 19:53:23 GMT, lab~rat <chase@cheese.net> wrote:

>On Tue, 23 Aug 2005 15:21:20 GMT, "Michael Selin"
><mselin@worldnet.att.net> puked:
>
>>Hi
>>Anyone out there have any big complaints or comments about the Honda s2000.
>>I am close to going for one over a more pratical WRX si or EVO.
>>PS: I am old and drive like an old fart most of the time, but who can
>>resist a re visit to the speed of the mid 1960's
>>

>
>I've driven one and like it. Ergonomically it fits me well. I have
>been toying with the idea with buying one and the only real issue I
>have is that it is 100% made in Japan.


why is that an issue?

>
>Maybe I'll buy a used one that's a year old?


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 23 Aug 2005, 06:49 pm
TWW
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: s2000


"Michael Selin" <mselin@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:Q9HOe.659485$cg1.564304@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> Hi
> Anyone out there have any big complaints or comments about the Honda

s2000.
> I am close to going for one over a more pratical WRX si or EVO.
> PS: I am old and drive like an old fart most of the time, but who can
> resist a re visit to the speed of the mid 1960's
>
>

I'm 64 and drive a 01 Prelude 5 spd. I could easily move into a S2000,
except the Prelude is a little more practical. The Acura RSX S is also a
good alternative. But, cars like this should be driven -- run em up into
the VTEC at least daily.


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 24 Aug 2005, 07:44 am
lab~rat
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: s2000

On Tue, 23 Aug 2005 17:12:21 -0400, flobert <nomail@here.NOT> puked:

>On Tue, 23 Aug 2005 19:53:23 GMT, lab~rat <chase@cheese.net> wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 23 Aug 2005 15:21:20 GMT, "Michael Selin"
>><mselin@worldnet.att.net> puked:
>>
>>>Hi
>>>Anyone out there have any big complaints or comments about the Honda s2000.
>>>I am close to going for one over a more pratical WRX si or EVO.
>>>PS: I am old and drive like an old fart most of the time, but who can
>>>resist a re visit to the speed of the mid 1960's
>>>

>>
>>I've driven one and like it. Ergonomically it fits me well. I have
>>been toying with the idea with buying one and the only real issue I
>>have is that it is 100% made in Japan.

>
>why is that an issue?


I generally only buy vehicles from N. America. You know, keep it in
the family...
--
lab~rat >:-)
Do you want polite or do you want sincere?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 24 Aug 2005, 09:59 am
flobert
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: s2000

On Wed, 24 Aug 2005 12:44:07 GMT, lab~rat <chase@cheese.net> wrote:

>On Tue, 23 Aug 2005 17:12:21 -0400, flobert <nomail@here.NOT> puked:
>
>>On Tue, 23 Aug 2005 19:53:23 GMT, lab~rat <chase@cheese.net> wrote:
>>
>>>On Tue, 23 Aug 2005 15:21:20 GMT, "Michael Selin"
>>><mselin@worldnet.att.net> puked:
>>>
>>>>Hi
>>>>Anyone out there have any big complaints or comments about the Honda s2000.
>>>>I am close to going for one over a more pratical WRX si or EVO.
>>>>PS: I am old and drive like an old fart most of the time, but who can
>>>>resist a re visit to the speed of the mid 1960's
>>>>
>>>
>>>I've driven one and like it. Ergonomically it fits me well. I have
>>>been toying with the idea with buying one and the only real issue I
>>>have is that it is 100% made in Japan.

>>
>>why is that an issue?

>
>I generally only buy vehicles from N. America. You know, keep it in
>the family...


Socialist labour unions, artificially making vehicles more expensive
by forcing wage deals for people at a level not in line with their
levels of education and experiance.

I have quie a few friends who've got family working in car assembly
plants elsewhere - the ford Escort/jag x-type plant in liverpol, and
the vauxhall plant in ellesmere port (which includes the GM V6 engine
plant) and they wish they were being paid as much as the unionised US
auto assemblers. I looked into applying for work at the taurus plant
in atlanta, but i really didn't like the working enviroment there. A
very bad atmosphere. I'll go for a japan-assembled car any time - the
work enviroment is much better, less hostiility in the air, less
friction between the tiers, and people work better in such
enviroments.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 24 Aug 2005, 01:22 pm
lab~rat
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: s2000

On Wed, 24 Aug 2005 10:59:51 -0400, flobert <nomail@here.NOT> puked:

>On Wed, 24 Aug 2005 12:44:07 GMT, lab~rat <chase@cheese.net> wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 23 Aug 2005 17:12:21 -0400, flobert <nomail@here.NOT> puked:
>>
>>>On Tue, 23 Aug 2005 19:53:23 GMT, lab~rat <chase@cheese.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Tue, 23 Aug 2005 15:21:20 GMT, "Michael Selin"
>>>><mselin@worldnet.att.net> puked:
>>>>
>>>>>Hi
>>>>>Anyone out there have any big complaints or comments about the Honda s2000.
>>>>>I am close to going for one over a more pratical WRX si or EVO.
>>>>>PS: I am old and drive like an old fart most of the time, but who can
>>>>>resist a re visit to the speed of the mid 1960's
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>I've driven one and like it. Ergonomically it fits me well. I have
>>>>been toying with the idea with buying one and the only real issue I
>>>>have is that it is 100% made in Japan.
>>>
>>>why is that an issue?

>>
>>I generally only buy vehicles from N. America. You know, keep it in
>>the family...

>
>Socialist labour unions, artificially making vehicles more expensive
>by forcing wage deals for people at a level not in line with their
>levels of education and experiance.
>
>I have quie a few friends who've got family working in car assembly
>plants elsewhere - the ford Escort/jag x-type plant in liverpol, and
>the vauxhall plant in ellesmere port (which includes the GM V6 engine
>plant) and they wish they were being paid as much as the unionised US
>auto assemblers. I looked into applying for work at the taurus plant
>in atlanta, but i really didn't like the working enviroment there. A
>very bad atmosphere. I'll go for a japan-assembled car any time - the
>work enviroment is much better, less hostiility in the air, less
>friction between the tiers, and people work better in such
>enviroments.


Good. That'll work out fine for you.
--
lab~rat >:-)
Do you want polite or do you want sincere?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 24 Aug 2005, 04:09 pm
miner.-
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: s2000


"TWW" <twaugh5@cox.net> wrote in message news:SMOOe.55$hp.3@lakeread08...

>>

> I'm 64 and drive a 01 Prelude 5 spd. I could easily move into a S2000,
> except the Prelude is a little more practical. The Acura RSX S is also a
> good alternative. But, cars like this should be driven -- run em up into
> the VTEC at least daily.
>


Fantastic, you made my day
:-)

miner.-


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Re: honda s2000 Pedro Honda 2 0 18 Jul 2005 08:56 am
Re: honda s2000 Pedro Honda 2 0 18 Jul 2005 08:54 am
S2000 vs Q45 remington288y@yahoo.com Honda 3 0 10 Dec 2004 12:48 pm
S2000 Richard Rimmer Honda 2 8 06 Jul 2004 01:02 am
S2000 John Booher Honda 3 7 26 Nov 2003 01:18 am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:50 am.


Attribution:
Honda News | Autoblog
Powered by Yahoo Answers

Archive: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456



Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.3.2 © 2009, Crawlability, Inc.
HondaCarForum.com is not affiliated with Honda Motor Company in any way. Honda Motor Company does not sponsor, support, or endorse HondaCarForum.com in any way. Copyright/trademark/sales mark infringements are not intended or implied.