Honda Car Forum

Acura is Honda by the way.
Is a 200HP 1.8 Litre, non turbo 4 cylinder good enough for you?

And I'm not sure what your smoking but the base civic currently has 115HP,
not 85, and next year the base will have 140HP

<hunkman7@excite.com> wrote in message
news:1122982355.008296.216920@z14g2000cwz.googlegr oups.com...
> They can't do better than that ?! The Civic is in major need of a good
> overhaul of design. It does not need a look Saturn and Acura came up
> with some years ago. By the way, are they addressing the underpowered
> 85-140 hp engine selections?
>

Civic is not an Acura ($30K+++). The base does come in at only 115 hp,
which is still far below the competition typically at 150-200 hp.


Jamco wrote:
> Acura is Honda by the way.
> Is a 200HP 1.8 Litre, non turbo 4 cylinder good enough for you?
>
> And I'm not sure what your smoking but the base civic currently has 115HP,
> not 85, and next year the base will have 140HP
>
> <hunkman7@excite.com> wrote in message
> news:1122982355.008296.216920@z14g2000cwz.googlegr oups.com...
> > They can't do better than that ?! The Civic is in major need of a good
> > overhaul of design. It does not need a look Saturn and Acura came up
> > with some years ago. By the way, are they addressing the underpowered
> > 85-140 hp engine selections?
> >

Funny, my 98 civic with 106 BHp with 140000 miles on it smokes the shit out
of the 'powerful' 2.2 and 2.4 liter cavaliers. And the neons don't even
bother trying, they know they suck.

Have you even driven a Honda? If so, do you know how to drive? Its called a
4 cylinder, try reving it up sometime. my civic redlines at 7100 rpms. what
does a cavalier do, like 4800?

And yes, Acura is a higher end branded honda. Maybe try reading a book
sometime.

t

hunkman7@excite.com wrote:
>Civic is not an Acura ($30K+++). The base does come in at only 115 hp,
>which is still far below the competition typically at 150-200 hp.
>
>> Acura is Honda by the way.
>> Is a 200HP 1.8 Litre, non turbo 4 cylinder good enough for you?
>[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>> > with some years ago. By the way, are they addressing the underpowered
>> > 85-140 hp engine selections?


--
Message posted via CarKB.com
http://www.carkb.com/Uwe/Forums.aspx...-cars/200508/1

On 2 Aug 2005 04:35:15 -0700, hunkman7@excite.com wrote:


>Best built cars include Buick, Malibu, Cadillac. I am not sure if
>Honda models made the top 10.


Once again, try reading. While your at it, look up the word
"research"...oh, that is if you know how to use a dictionary...

He's a troll. Don't feed him.

"HPGrn" <majorret310@nospam.yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:d4vve1t2jlp8bsfc1rohpoi7o6ncv42pah@4ax.com...
> On 2 Aug 2005 04:35:15 -0700, hunkman7@excite.com wrote:
>
>
> >Best built cars include Buick, Malibu, Cadillac. I am not sure if
> >Honda models made the top 10.
>
>
> Once again, try reading. While your at it, look up the word
> "research"...oh, that is if you know how to use a dictionary...