Honda Car Forum


 

Go Back   Honda Car Forum - Accord Parts Civic Tuning Acura Racing > Honda Acura > Honda 2

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 08 Nov 2010, 07:16 pm
George Gonzola
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Time for new? or should I put money into current?

I have a 2003 Accord V6 EX-L with a little over 220k miles on it. It
is due for new tires, water pump and 2 of the engine mounts are
cracked. Parts/labor would probably cost me around $1500+. What is
a fair price to have the water pump and engine mounts replaced? I am
in Philadelphia area. It still runs well, but wondering if other
things will start to go on it. Should I save the $1500+ and use the
car as trade-in on another car, or should I try to squeeze a little
more life out of her?

Any thoughts?

Thanks

George
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 08 Nov 2010, 10:23 pm
Elle
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Time for new? or should I put money into current?

2-door or 4-door? Auto or manual transmission? 5-speed or 6-speed?

Check the private party price of this car at www.kbb.com . I would say
your Accord is in "fair condition." A few assumptions suggest it is
worth around $5k "as is" in Philadelphia. Could $6500k buy a
comparable car? Maybe, the catch is it would be used and you would not
know its history well.

The only reason fixing everything would not be worth it is if you just
like to drive a new car. If this is the case, the heck with money.
Trade it in.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 09 Nov 2010, 04:40 am
George Gonzola
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Time for new? or should I put money into current?

4-dr, automatic,5 speed


On Mon, 8 Nov 2010 20:23:40 -0800 (PST), Elle
<honda.lioness@gmail.com> wrote:

>2-door or 4-door? Auto or manual transmission? 5-speed or 6-speed?
>
>Check the private party price of this car at www.kbb.com . I would say
>your Accord is in "fair condition." A few assumptions suggest it is
>worth around $5k "as is" in Philadelphia. Could $6500k buy a
>comparable car? Maybe, the catch is it would be used and you would not
>know its history well.
>
>The only reason fixing everything would not be worth it is if you just
>like to drive a new car. If this is the case, the heck with money.
>Trade it in.


Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 09 Nov 2010, 07:03 am
bobmct
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Time for new? or should I put money into current?

On Mon, 08 Nov 2010 20:16:22 -0500, George Gonzola
<gorgonzola@home.com> wrote:

> I have a 2003 Accord V6 EX-L with a little over 220k miles on it. It
>is due for new tires, water pump and 2 of the engine mounts are
>cracked. Parts/labor would probably cost me around $1500+. What is
>a fair price to have the water pump and engine mounts replaced? I am
>in Philadelphia area. It still runs well, but wondering if other
>things will start to go on it. Should I save the $1500+ and use the
>car as trade-in on another car, or should I try to squeeze a little
>more life out of her?
>
>Any thoughts?
>
>Thanks
>
>George



This is a great site to help you:

http://repairpal.com/

Takes the surprise out of repair visits.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 09 Nov 2010, 07:03 am
Jim Yanik
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Time for new? or should I put money into current?

George Gonzola <gorgonzola@home.com> wrote in
news:9i7hd6lvtl37h509t1f2sc0j4plp163vkq@4ax.com:

> I have a 2003 Accord V6 EX-L with a little over 220k miles on it. It
> is due for new tires, water pump and 2 of the engine mounts are
> cracked. Parts/labor would probably cost me around $1500+. What is
> a fair price to have the water pump and engine mounts replaced? I am
> in Philadelphia area. It still runs well, but wondering if other
> things will start to go on it. Should I save the $1500+ and use the
> car as trade-in on another car, or should I try to squeeze a little
> more life out of her?
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> Thanks
>
> George


in today's economy,it's not wise to go into debt to buy a new car;
repair your 03. Have a mechanic go over the car thoroughly.

--
Jim Yanik
jyanik
at
localnet
dot com
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 09 Nov 2010, 07:22 am
dgk
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Time for new? or should I put money into current?

On Tue, 09 Nov 2010 05:40:22 -0500, George Gonzola
<gorgonzola@home.com> wrote:

>4-dr, automatic,5 speed
>
>
>On Mon, 8 Nov 2010 20:23:40 -0800 (PST), Elle
><honda.lioness@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>2-door or 4-door? Auto or manual transmission? 5-speed or 6-speed?
>>
>>Check the private party price of this car at www.kbb.com . I would say
>>your Accord is in "fair condition." A few assumptions suggest it is
>>worth around $5k "as is" in Philadelphia. Could $6500k buy a
>>comparable car? Maybe, the catch is it would be used and you would not
>>know its history well.
>>
>>The only reason fixing everything would not be worth it is if you just
>>like to drive a new car. If this is the case, the heck with money.
>>Trade it in.



I asked the same question a few weeks back about my 91 Accord with
120k. It needs, at least, tires, the major service (must be at least
$500), and a paint/rust job. But that's all that I know for sure that
it needs and it seems to run fine.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 09 Nov 2010, 06:55 pm
Stewart
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Time for new? or should I put money into current?


"George Gonzola" <gorgonzola@home.com> wrote in message
news:439id6db1ungn1vvufnqf0vv1ogtb5j3p4@4ax.com...
> 4-dr, automatic,5 speed
>
>
> On Mon, 8 Nov 2010 20:23:40 -0800 (PST), Elle
> <honda.lioness@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>2-door or 4-door? Auto or manual transmission? 5-speed or 6-speed?
>>
>>Check the private party price of this car at www.kbb.com . I would
>>say
>>your Accord is in "fair condition." A few assumptions suggest it is
>>worth around $5k "as is" in Philadelphia. Could $6500k buy a
>>comparable car? Maybe, the catch is it would be used and you would
>>not
>>know its history well.
>>
>>The only reason fixing everything would not be worth it is if you
>>just
>>like to drive a new car. If this is the case, the heck with money.
>>Trade it in.

>


How about the timing belt? 105k or 7 years interval, I believe....


Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 09 Nov 2010, 07:48 pm
clams
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Time for new? or should I put money into current?


"Elle" <honda.lioness@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:a0ff2158-983b-4c59-8fcc-9a7ce7acb302@j18g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
> 2-door or 4-door? Auto or manual transmission? 5-speed or 6-speed?
>
> Check the private party price of this car at www.kbb.com . I would say
> your Accord is in "fair condition." A few assumptions suggest it is
> worth around $5k "as is" in Philadelphia. Could $6500k buy a
> comparable car? Maybe, the catch is it would be used and you would not
> know its history well.
>
> The only reason fixing everything would not be worth it is if you just
> like to drive a new car. If this is the case, the heck with money.
> Trade it in.



$5K seems quite high via Edmonds estimate - about half that is more likely.
http://www.edmunds.com/tmv/used/index.html

Nevertheless, water pump and timing belt could run about $800 at a dealer.
Add in another $100 for plugs plus a likely needed tuneup with fluid changes
and the cost climbs rapidly. Are the brakes decent? That could add as
much as another $500, depending on rotors & pads. If there is any doubt
about the transmission, I'd cut my losses. If the transmission is running
well, the decision gets more difficult.

Any trade you'd get on such a car would likely be the discount you'd get
with no trade.

I'll be facing a similar situation in about a year where my 2000 V6 EX
Accord currently has about 194k miles, but in my case, the battery, brakes,
fluids & tires should be good for another 50-60k, having made a $3k
maintenance investment at about 185k miles.

For me, I can justify a lot of repairs to offset the sales tax and property
tax on a (newer) replacement vehicle (plus added insurance if going for a
late model).


Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 09 Nov 2010, 07:53 pm
clams
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Time for new? or should I put money into current?


"clams" <clams@drunkinclam.com> wrote in message
news:ibctjb$u1a$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>
> "Elle" <honda.lioness@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:a0ff2158-983b-4c59-8fcc-9a7ce7acb302@j18g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
>> 2-door or 4-door? Auto or manual transmission? 5-speed or 6-speed?
>>
>> Check the private party price of this car at www.kbb.com . I would say
>> your Accord is in "fair condition." A few assumptions suggest it is
>> worth around $5k "as is" in Philadelphia. Could $6500k buy a
>> comparable car? Maybe, the catch is it would be used and you would not
>> know its history well.
>>
>> The only reason fixing everything would not be worth it is if you just
>> like to drive a new car. If this is the case, the heck with money.
>> Trade it in.

>
>
> $5K seems quite high via Edmonds estimate - about half that is more
> likely. http://www.edmunds.com/tmv/used/index.html
>
> Nevertheless, water pump and timing belt could run about $800 at a
> dealer. Add in another $100 for plugs plus a likely needed tuneup with
> fluid changes and the cost climbs rapidly. Are the brakes decent? That
> could add as much as another $500, depending on rotors & pads. If there
> is any doubt about the transmission, I'd cut my losses. If the
> transmission is running well, the decision gets more difficult.
>
> Any trade you'd get on such a car would likely be the discount you'd get
> with no trade.
>
> I'll be facing a similar situation in about a year where my 2000 V6 EX
> Accord currently has about 194k miles, but in my case, the battery,
> brakes, fluids & tires should be good for another 50-60k, having made a
> $3k maintenance investment at about 185k miles.
>
> For me, I can justify a lot of repairs to offset the sales tax and
> property tax on a (newer) replacement vehicle (plus added insurance if
> going for a late model).
>


I should have added that even with the relatively big $3k investment at
185k, my cost has been about 17 cents / mile plus gas (about 28.5 mpg
overall), property taxes & insurance (including full depreciation).
Needless to say, I've been VERY pleased with that vehicle.


Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 09 Nov 2010, 10:21 pm
Elle
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Time for new? or should I put money into current?

On Nov 9, 6:48*pm, "clams" <cl...@drunkinclam.com> wrote:
> $5K seems quite high via Edmonds estimate - about half that is more likely.http://www.edmunds.com/tmv/used/index.html


I am aware that Edmunds gives much different numbers for used car
values. However Kelley Blue Book is the standard. Ask around. See also
http://www.kbb.com/car-advice/articl...ue-book-values

Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Got my Civic with an automatic trans., wondering how much money & time will it take me to... juano Honda Technical 4 23 Jan 2009 10:16 pm
Honda Car For First Time Drivers - What's A Great Value-For-Money Car? Lilian B Honda Technical 6 03 Sep 2008 10:06 pm
did I waste my money time doing a timming belt martym Honda Technical 2 19 Jan 2008 10:07 pm
How much time and money will it cost for the 90k checkup on my civic? cameron h Honda Technical 4 30 Sep 2007 02:48 pm
Integra Auto to Man tranny swap, time and money? Andy S Acura Technical 4 20 Aug 2007 03:52 pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:00 am.


Attribution:
Honda News | Autoblog
Powered by Yahoo Answers




Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2 © 2011, Crawlability, Inc.
HondaCarForum.com is not affiliated with Honda Motor Company in any way. Honda Motor Company does not sponsor, support, or endorse HondaCarForum.com in any way. Copyright/trademark/sales mark infringements are not intended or implied.