Honda Car Forum

If you have own or have ever owned a Honda Accord for some time, surely you
know how weak the brakes are.

Not only are they not very powerful (very difficult to get the brakes to the
point of lock-up), but the front rotors have to be replaced often as
compared to most cars.

MY QUESTION IS: Does anyone know of any aftermarket brakes that are better
than the weak stock brakes for a 1987 ACCORD LX-i (besides from Midas or
Meineke)? Perhaps even a high performance brake kit upgrade?

Thanks in advance.

DW wrote:
> If you have own or have ever owned a Honda Accord for some time, surely you
> know how weak the brakes are.
>
> Not only are they not very powerful (very difficult to get the brakes to the
> point of lock-up), but the front rotors have to be replaced often as
> compared to most cars.
>
> MY QUESTION IS: Does anyone know of any aftermarket brakes that are better
> than the weak stock brakes for a 1987 ACCORD LX-i (besides from Midas or
> Meineke)? Perhaps even a high performance brake kit upgrade?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
>

I just replaced the brake pads for the second time (no cost for
parts,lifetime pads from Parts America) on my Accord LX. I bought it
new, and it just turned 226,000 miles. Rotors are original and still
thicker than spec. Rear shoes are still fine.
I guess I'm just not as rough on the brakes as some people. bob

"DW" <dwinslow2@qwest.net> wrote in
news:VhOte.92$4H2.29835@news.uswest.net:

> If you have own or have ever owned a Honda Accord for some time,
> surely you know how weak the brakes are.


Poorly maintained and out-of-adjustment brakes will feel "weak". I suspect
this is your case. I have not encountered a car with brakes that were hard
to "lock up" since my friend's old '74 Chev Nova with non-power drums all
around.

What year is your car? How many miles? How often are the brakes serviced?
Has the master cylinder ever been replaced?


>
> Not only are they not very powerful (very difficult to get the brakes
> to the point of lock-up), but the front rotors have to be replaced
> often as compared to most cars.


This suggests you live in an area with snow or salt air, and you're not
driving enough to burn the moisture off.


>
> MY QUESTION IS: Does anyone know of any aftermarket brakes that are
> better than the weak stock brakes for a 1987 ACCORD LX-i (besides
> from Midas or Meineke)? Perhaps even a high performance brake kit
> upgrade?


Proper maintenance will help a lot. If pads and/or pins are sticking, this
will *dramatically* reduce braking performance.

Accords and some other later-model Hondas apparently have a problem with
hoses that are a bit too flexible, leading to a softer feeling poedal on
hot days. Aftermarket braided hoses intended for race use can supposedly
eliminate this as a cause of a poor pedal.


--
TeGGeR®

The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/

This reminds me of the review from Edmunds. They are complaining the Accord
should have a more powerful brake...

To my experience, the brake is pretty powerful and sharp. But my 2005
Accord is only 500 miles, maybe it is still too early to comment on its
performance...

DW wrote:
> If you have own or have ever owned a Honda Accord for some time, surely you
> know how weak the brakes are.
>
> Not only are they not very powerful (very difficult to get the brakes to the
> point of lock-up), but the front rotors have to be replaced often as
> compared to most cars.
>
> MY QUESTION IS: Does anyone know of any aftermarket brakes that are better
> than the weak stock brakes for a 1987 ACCORD LX-i (besides from Midas or
> Meineke)? Perhaps even a high performance brake kit upgrade?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
>
1. use oem pads.
2. recondition the front calipers.
3. make sure the system is bled thoroughly with fresh fluid.

I too have a 1987 Accord (DX), and the brakes have always been the weakest part of
the car. I bought the car new, and the original brakes failed at about 15K miles
(mostly highway driving). The dealer replaced them for free. The brakes have *always*
been weak since the day I bought it. In the 18+ years that I've owned it, I can say
that the weak brakes was one contributing factor to a minor accident I had a few
years back. I stepped on the brakes hard, but (as usual) the car slowed (gradually),
but not commensurate with how hard I was stepping on the brake peddle. Trying to lock
the wheels by braking at anytime during the last 18 years was/is merely a fantasy. I
just isn't going to happen no matter what. Braking performance is the one thing I
miss about my previous Toyota, as it would stop on a dime. If anyone finds a cure for
this, please let me know, as I like everything else about my Accord (227k miles and
still going strong....).
Ken
===
"DW" <dwinslow2@qwest.net> wrote in message
news:VhOte.92$4H2.29835@news.uswest.net...
> If you have own or have ever owned a Honda Accord for some time, surely you know
> how weak the brakes are.
>
> Not only are they not very powerful (very difficult to get the brakes to the point
> of lock-up), but the front rotors have to be replaced often as compared to most
> cars.
>
> MY QUESTION IS: Does anyone know of any aftermarket brakes that are better than
> the weak stock brakes for a 1987 ACCORD LX-i (besides from Midas or Meineke)?
> Perhaps even a high performance brake kit upgrade?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>

Ken, mine has 193K, and I likewise bought mine new back in '87. I don't
know how many years this was a problem area for the Accord or other
Honda/Acura models, but the brakes are definitely not up to par with the
rest of the car. I even researched aftermarket brakes and had some put on
(OEM size cross-drilled and slotted with GreenStuff pads) and they did work
better but they still worn prematurely and the rotors needed to be replaced
(apparently they couldn't be turned) only after about a year. Perhaps the
premature wear on the front brakes may be due to the lack of help from the
rear drums.

I do have to note however, that when the brakes have just been replaced you
can get them to lock up for perhaps the first 100 miles or so, then back to
the mediocre performance of norm. I guess one benefit to this is that you
won't go into any uncontrollable skids. ;-)

One last thing I want to point out about Honda/Acura cars is that there is
one additional weak point (besides the flimzy hood rod holder) on these
cars, and that is the auto trans. Not a big problem, but expect to replace
it in the 100k to 150k range. I can legitimately say this from the
experience I've had with these cars over the years. I've owned an '87 Acura
Integra (2nd gear clutch went out around 110k), an '88 Acura Legend (2nd
gear clutch went out around 117k), an '88 Honda Accord Coupe (2nd gear
clutch was going out around 115k), and my '87 Accord LX-i sedan (the tranny
was having problems around 150k). I have had different makes before too but
never experienced such consistant transmission problems like in the Honda
products.

If you experience transmission problems in your Honda/Acura vehicle,
especially in the late 1980's models, you will save money and a lot of time
to just have the entire transmission replaced instead of having it
rebuilt/repaired -costs about the same anyway (it was around $2,000! each
time for me).


"KenA" <kabrahamsen@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:cOidnTUCVOYcBSbfRVn-2w@comcast.com...
>I too have a 1987 Accord (DX), and the brakes have always been the weakest
>part of the car. I bought the car new, and the original brakes failed at
>about 15K miles (mostly highway driving). The dealer replaced them for
>free. The brakes have *always* been weak since the day I bought it. In the
>18+ years that I've owned it, I can say that the weak brakes was one
>contributing factor to a minor accident I had a few years back. I stepped
>on the brakes hard, but (as usual) the car slowed (gradually), but not
>commensurate with how hard I was stepping on the brake peddle. Trying to
>lock the wheels by braking at anytime during the last 18 years was/is
>merely a fantasy. I just isn't going to happen no matter what. Braking
>performance is the one thing I miss about my previous Toyota, as it would
>stop on a dime. If anyone finds a cure for this, please let me know, as I
>like everything else about my Accord (227k miles and still going
>strong....).
> Ken
> ===
> "DW" <dwinslow2@qwest.net> wrote in message
> news:VhOte.92$4H2.29835@news.uswest.net...
>> If you have own or have ever owned a Honda Accord for some time, surely
>> you know how weak the brakes are.
>>
>> Not only are they not very powerful (very difficult to get the brakes to
>> the point of lock-up), but the front rotors have to be replaced often as
>> compared to most cars.
>>
>> MY QUESTION IS: Does anyone know of any aftermarket brakes that are
>> better than the weak stock brakes for a 1987 ACCORD LX-i (besides from
>> Midas or Meineke)? Perhaps even a high performance brake kit upgrade?
>>
>> Thanks in advance.
>>
>
>

Last Friday (at 227K miles) I just replaced the original clutch and original front
struts, so I guess I was lucky not having an automatic transmission.
Ken
"DW" <dwinslow2@qwest.net> wrote in message
news:8Z%ue.1444$BA6.6743@news.uswest.net...
> Ken, mine has 193K, and I likewise bought mine new back in '87. I don't know how
> many years this was a problem area for the Accord or other Honda/Acura models, but
> the brakes are definitely not up to par with the rest of the car. I even
> researched aftermarket brakes and had some put on (OEM size cross-drilled and
> slotted with GreenStuff pads) and they did work better but they still worn
> prematurely and the rotors needed to be replaced (apparently they couldn't be
> turned) only after about a year. Perhaps the premature wear on the front brakes
> may be due to the lack of help from the rear drums.
>
> I do have to note however, that when the brakes have just been replaced you can get
> them to lock up for perhaps the first 100 miles or so, then back to the mediocre
> performance of norm. I guess one benefit to this is that you won't go into any
> uncontrollable skids. ;-)
>
> One last thing I want to point out about Honda/Acura cars is that there is one
> additional weak point (besides the flimzy hood rod holder) on these cars, and that
> is the auto trans. Not a big problem, but expect to replace it in the 100k to 150k
> range. I can legitimately say this from the experience I've had with these cars
> over the years. I've owned an '87 Acura Integra (2nd gear clutch went out around
> 110k), an '88 Acura Legend (2nd gear clutch went out around 117k), an '88 Honda
> Accord Coupe (2nd gear clutch was going out around 115k), and my '87 Accord LX-i
> sedan (the tranny was having problems around 150k). I have had different makes
> before too but never experienced such consistant transmission problems like in the
> Honda products.
>
> If you experience transmission problems in your Honda/Acura vehicle, especially in
> the late 1980's models, you will save money and a lot of time to just have the
> entire transmission replaced instead of having it rebuilt/repaired -costs about the
> same anyway (it was around $2,000! each time for me).
>
>
> "KenA" <kabrahamsen@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:cOidnTUCVOYcBSbfRVn-2w@comcast.com...
>>I too have a 1987 Accord (DX), and the brakes have always been the weakest part of
>>the car. I bought the car new, and the original brakes failed at about 15K miles
>>(mostly highway driving). The dealer replaced them for free. The brakes have
>>*always* been weak since the day I bought it. In the 18+ years that I've owned it,
>>I can say that the weak brakes was one contributing factor to a minor accident I
>>had a few years back. I stepped on the brakes hard, but (as usual) the car slowed
>>(gradually), but not commensurate with how hard I was stepping on the brake peddle.
>>Trying to lock the wheels by braking at anytime during the last 18 years was/is
>>merely a fantasy. I just isn't going to happen no matter what. Braking performance
>>is the one thing I miss about my previous Toyota, as it would stop on a dime. If
>>anyone finds a cure for this, please let me know, as I like everything else about
>>my Accord (227k miles and still going strong....).
>> Ken
>> ===
>> "DW" <dwinslow2@qwest.net> wrote in message
>> news:VhOte.92$4H2.29835@news.uswest.net...
>>> If you have own or have ever owned a Honda Accord for some time, surely you know
>>> how weak the brakes are.
>>>
>>> Not only are they not very powerful (very difficult to get the brakes to the
>>> point of lock-up), but the front rotors have to be replaced often as compared to
>>> most cars.
>>>
>>> MY QUESTION IS: Does anyone know of any aftermarket brakes that are better than
>>> the weak stock brakes for a 1987 ACCORD LX-i (besides from Midas or Meineke)?
>>> Perhaps even a high performance brake kit upgrade?
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance.
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

DW wrote:
> Ken, mine has 193K, and I likewise bought mine new back in '87. I don't
> know how many years this was a problem area for the Accord or other
> Honda/Acura models, but the brakes are definitely not up to par with the
> rest of the car. I even researched aftermarket brakes and had some put on
> (OEM size cross-drilled and slotted with GreenStuff pads) and they did work
> better but they still worn prematurely and the rotors needed to be replaced
> (apparently they couldn't be turned) only after about a year. Perhaps the
> premature wear on the front brakes may be due to the lack of help from the
> rear drums.
>
> I do have to note however, that when the brakes have just been replaced you
> can get them to lock up for perhaps the first 100 miles or so, then back to
> the mediocre performance of norm. I guess one benefit to this is that you
> won't go into any uncontrollable skids. ;-)
>
> One last thing I want to point out about Honda/Acura cars is that there is
> one additional weak point (besides the flimzy hood rod holder) on these
> cars, and that is the auto trans. Not a big problem, but expect to replace
> it in the 100k to 150k range. I can legitimately say this from the
> experience I've had with these cars over the years. I've owned an '87 Acura
> Integra (2nd gear clutch went out around 110k), an '88 Acura Legend (2nd
> gear clutch went out around 117k), an '88 Honda Accord Coupe (2nd gear
> clutch was going out around 115k), and my '87 Accord LX-i sedan (the tranny
> was having problems around 150k). I have had different makes before too but
> never experienced such consistant transmission problems like in the Honda
> products.

really? my previous 89 civic auto was at 260k, original transmission.
my friends 88 accord auto was at 360k, original transmission. my
current 89 civic auto is 125k, strong as an ox. other friends have an
accord with 280k, auto, original transmission. just come to california
and see the ancient hondas on the road.

seriously, i don't think honda [in this era] are guilty of "consistant
transmission problems". post 2000, yes, prior? no.

>
> If you experience transmission problems in your Honda/Acura vehicle,
> especially in the late 1980's models, you will save money and a lot of time
> to just have the entire transmission replaced instead of having it
> rebuilt/repaired -costs about the same anyway (it was around $2,000! each
> time for me).
>
>
> "KenA" <kabrahamsen@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:cOidnTUCVOYcBSbfRVn-2w@comcast.com...
>
>>I too have a 1987 Accord (DX), and the brakes have always been the weakest
>>part of the car. I bought the car new, and the original brakes failed at
>>about 15K miles (mostly highway driving). The dealer replaced them for
>>free. The brakes have *always* been weak since the day I bought it. In the
>>18+ years that I've owned it, I can say that the weak brakes was one
>>contributing factor to a minor accident I had a few years back. I stepped
>>on the brakes hard, but (as usual) the car slowed (gradually), but not
>>commensurate with how hard I was stepping on the brake peddle. Trying to
>>lock the wheels by braking at anytime during the last 18 years was/is
>>merely a fantasy. I just isn't going to happen no matter what. Braking
>>performance is the one thing I miss about my previous Toyota, as it would
>>stop on a dime. If anyone finds a cure for this, please let me know, as I
>>like everything else about my Accord (227k miles and still going
>>strong....).
>>Ken
>>===
>>"DW" <dwinslow2@qwest.net> wrote in message
>>news:VhOte.92$4H2.29835@news.uswest.net...
>>
>>>If you have own or have ever owned a Honda Accord for some time, surely
>>>you know how weak the brakes are.
>>>
>>>Not only are they not very powerful (very difficult to get the brakes to
>>>the point of lock-up), but the front rotors have to be replaced often as
>>>compared to most cars.
>>>
>>>MY QUESTION IS: Does anyone know of any aftermarket brakes that are
>>>better than the weak stock brakes for a 1987 ACCORD LX-i (besides from
>>>Midas or Meineke)? Perhaps even a high performance brake kit upgrade?
>>>
>>>Thanks in advance.
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

"DW" <dwinslow2@qwest.net> wrote in message
news:VhOte.92$4H2.29835@news.uswest.net...
> MY QUESTION IS: Does anyone know of any aftermarket brakes that are
> better than the weak stock brakes for a 1987 ACCORD LX-i (besides from
> Midas or Meineke)? Perhaps even a high performance brake kit upgrade?

It depends on what you are prepared to do. Yes, the brakes are a bit small,
not ventilated as I recall, and heat up quickly. Std sized cross drilled
rotors are OK, but slotted rotors are for racing applications, make a lot of
dust and wear out quickly. Both "solutions" are trying to make an inadequate
system work more efficiently.

The solution is relatively simple: you need to use a bigger diameter
ventilated disk and larger surface area pads.

A high performance brake kit upgrade is NOT the answer, and will cost more
than an alternative solution using stock Honda parts.

There are bigger rotor kits that retain the original caliper. There may not
be a kit for an 87 Accord, but these won't help, because you need a thicker
ventilated disk and hence you have to change the calipers too.

Probably the simplest thing is to replace the rotors and calipers with
ventilated rotors and calipers from a recent (say 98 +) Accord. There are
some potential problems to handle

1) Recent Accords have a 4x114.3mm (4.50") stud pattern. I THINK your 87 has
the same, but it might be 4x100mm, in which case you need recent Civic
rotors and calipers.

2) While the 98+ rotors might fit on the 87 hub, you might need a small
spacer underneath.

3) the replacement caliper bracket MAY just bolt up to your hub and fit the
disk properly, but more likely you'll need an adapter bracket.

4) your current wheels should fit around the later model brakes. Make sure
that you have new pads when assembling this arrangement, to ensure wheel
clearance.

5) If the replacement calipers have the same or very similar piston
diameter, you won't have to change your master cylinder to a larger
diameter. Otherwise, the brake pedal will be very mushy even when bled
correctly.

So, if you want to do this, you'll need a (performance) garage that has
access to a machine shop (unless the parts just bolt on). You could start by
going to your local wrecker and comparing various bits to see what fits
what. Its not particularly difficult, but does take planning.


Have a look at www.pixcl.com/lancerproject.htm for details on big brake
swaps on a Mitsubishi Lancer / Mirage. The same general process applies to
Hondas.

Stewart DIBBS