Honda Car Forum


 

Go Back   Honda Car Forum - Accord Parts Civic Tuning Acura Racing > Honda Acura > Honda 2


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 05 Jun 2005, 05:50 pm
John Horner
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Rapid wearing rear brakes on 2003 Accord

I was surprised to recently discover that the rear pads on my 31,000
mile Accord were worn out to the point that one of the wear sensors was
making it's sound occassionally. The front pads still have at least
50% of their original thickness remaining.

I changed out all pads front and rear and turned the rotors due to
chronic vibration on high speed braking.

Now both problems are fixed and the cost was not bad as I did the work
myself, but this is still a surprise to me. None of my other vehicles
have ever worn out the rear brakes first ... and no, I have not been
driving with the parking brake on .

On all four wheels the sliding caliper also seems to be of a marginal
design as the pads on the piston side were much more heavily worn than
those on the opposite side. Honda, like most makers these days, has
gone for the cheapest possible caliper architecture.

John
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 05 Jun 2005, 08:01 pm
jim beam
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Rapid wearing rear brakes on 2003 Accord

John Horner wrote:
> I was surprised to recently discover that the rear pads on my 31,000
> mile Accord were worn out to the point that one of the wear sensors was
> making it's sound occassionally. The front pads still have at least
> 50% of their original thickness remaining.
>
> I changed out all pads front and rear and turned the rotors due to
> chronic vibration on high speed braking.
>
> Now both problems are fixed and the cost was not bad as I did the work
> myself, but this is still a surprise to me. None of my other vehicles
> have ever worn out the rear brakes first ... and no, I have not been
> driving with the parking brake on .
>
> On all four wheels the sliding caliper also seems to be of a marginal
> design as the pads on the piston side were much more heavily worn than
> those on the opposite side. Honda, like most makers these days, has
> gone for the cheapest possible caliper architecture.
>
> John


something about this situation does not compute. pads don't wear unless
they're being used or unless they're dragging. we have your word about
the parking brake, so they have to be dragging in some other way. that
/has/ to have a cause - it can only be:

1. brake cable incorrectly adjusted
2. brake cable not releasing correctly
3. parking brake mechanism jammed
4. caliper slider not free
5. piston not self adjusting correctly
6. piston jammed

it could also potentially be something defective with the proportioning
valve, but that's a /very/ low probability.

based on age, it's unlikely that the caliper pistons are corroded or
that the slider mechanisms are corroded or that the cables are corroded.
that leaves something to do with prior maintenance. given that you've
had to skim the disks already, a classic symptom of incorrect
maintenance, i'd say some work was done, & whichever of the above it
touched, it wasn't done right - maybe the pistons were not wound back in
correctly causing self-adjust problems. hopefully, it'll be ok for now
with the work you've done, but skimmed disks are at best a fudge and do
not address the the real cause of the problem.

regarding brake vibration, pay very close attention to re-torquing the
lug nuts. do /not/ use an impact wrench, regardless of whether "it
/should/ be ok". use a 2-stage torque process, 1-3-2-4 - 1-3-2-4. the
honda hubs are relatively light weight and elastically distort as the
lugs are tightened. this is ok, /provided/ correct torque procedure is
observed because the distortion ends up being even - it's what it's
designed for. the problem is that this kind of system is /not/ abuse
tolerant unlike some heavy old ford hub that weighs 3 times more. if
/incorrect/ torque process is done, the hub distortion is uneven and the
disk is consequently distorted also. provided it is not allowed to wear
for an extended period in this condition, [and provided that the vehicle
is not high mileage with worn ball joints] brake judder can be
completely eliminated by simply re-torquing using the correct procedure.

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 05 Jun 2005, 08:40 pm
Howard Lester
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Rapid wearing rear brakes on 2003 Accord


"John Horner" wrote

> I was surprised to recently discover that the rear pads on my 31,000
> mile Accord were worn out to the point that one of the wear sensors was
> making it's sound occassionally. The front pads still have at least
> 50% of their original thickness remaining.


Despite the fact that all is well now doesn't mean it won't happen again.
You're fortunate to be able to do this work yourself. Since the car is under
warranty, why not take it in and have the dealership go over the braking
system to see if something is wrong?


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 05 Jun 2005, 09:48 pm
Al
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Rapid wearing rear brakes on 2003 Accord

There have been a lot of reports of early rear pad wear on these 03's.
Mine were gone at 25,000 - less that half of what I've ever experienced
on any other car. I would add a number 7 to your list - Improperly
engineered component.

jim beam wrote:
> John Horner wrote:
>
>> I was surprised to recently discover that the rear pads on my 31,000
>> mile Accord were worn out to the point that one of the wear sensors
>> was making it's sound occassionally. The front pads still have at
>> least 50% of their original thickness remaining.
>>
>> I changed out all pads front and rear and turned the rotors due to
>> chronic vibration on high speed braking.
>>
>> Now both problems are fixed and the cost was not bad as I did the work
>> myself, but this is still a surprise to me. None of my other
>> vehicles have ever worn out the rear brakes first ... and no, I have
>> not been driving with the parking brake on .
>>
>> On all four wheels the sliding caliper also seems to be of a marginal
>> design as the pads on the piston side were much more heavily worn than
>> those on the opposite side. Honda, like most makers these days, has
>> gone for the cheapest possible caliper architecture.
>>
>> John

>
>
> something about this situation does not compute. pads don't wear unless
> they're being used or unless they're dragging. we have your word about
> the parking brake, so they have to be dragging in some other way. that
> /has/ to have a cause - it can only be:
>
> 1. brake cable incorrectly adjusted
> 2. brake cable not releasing correctly
> 3. parking brake mechanism jammed
> 4. caliper slider not free
> 5. piston not self adjusting correctly
> 6. piston jammed
>
> it could also potentially be something defective with the proportioning
> valve, but that's a /very/ low probability.
>
> based on age, it's unlikely that the caliper pistons are corroded or
> that the slider mechanisms are corroded or that the cables are corroded.
> that leaves something to do with prior maintenance. given that you've
> had to skim the disks already, a classic symptom of incorrect
> maintenance, i'd say some work was done, & whichever of the above it
> touched, it wasn't done right - maybe the pistons were not wound back in
> correctly causing self-adjust problems. hopefully, it'll be ok for now
> with the work you've done, but skimmed disks are at best a fudge and do
> not address the the real cause of the problem.
>
> regarding brake vibration, pay very close attention to re-torquing the
> lug nuts. do /not/ use an impact wrench, regardless of whether "it
> /should/ be ok". use a 2-stage torque process, 1-3-2-4 - 1-3-2-4. the
> honda hubs are relatively light weight and elastically distort as the
> lugs are tightened. this is ok, /provided/ correct torque procedure is
> observed because the distortion ends up being even - it's what it's
> designed for. the problem is that this kind of system is /not/ abuse
> tolerant unlike some heavy old ford hub that weighs 3 times more. if
> /incorrect/ torque process is done, the hub distortion is uneven and the
> disk is consequently distorted also. provided it is not allowed to wear
> for an extended period in this condition, [and provided that the vehicle
> is not high mileage with worn ball joints] brake judder can be
> completely eliminated by simply re-torquing using the correct procedure.
>

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 05 Jun 2005, 10:36 pm
John Horner
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Rapid wearing rear brakes on 2003 Accord

Howard Lester wrote:
> "John Horner" wrote
>
>
>>I was surprised to recently discover that the rear pads on my 31,000
>>mile Accord were worn out to the point that one of the wear sensors was
>>making it's sound occassionally. The front pads still have at least
>>50% of their original thickness remaining.

>
>
> Despite the fact that all is well now doesn't mean it won't happen again.
> You're fortunate to be able to do this work yourself. Since the car is under
> warranty, why not take it in and have the dealership go over the braking
> system to see if something is wrong?
>
>


I tried that first. They said that Honda does not cover any brake
issues after 12,000 miles. I gave up arguing with them!

John
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2000 Accord EX rear brakes time2bail Honda 3 1 23 Feb 2005 02:33 pm
2002 Accord Rear Brakes Alan McLeod Honda 2 3 29 Nov 2004 04:36 pm
2000 accord SE - rear drum brakes self-adjusting ? davetest Honda 2 6 24 May 2004 12:44 am
2003 TL, Type-S, Front brakes - vibration, Rear brakes - wear Alex Vilner Acura 6 20 Aug 2003 09:09 am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:42 am.


Attribution:
Honda News | Autoblog
Powered by Yahoo Answers

Archive: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457



Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.3.2 © 2009, Crawlability, Inc.
HondaCarForum.com is not affiliated with Honda Motor Company in any way. Honda Motor Company does not sponsor, support, or endorse HondaCarForum.com in any way. Copyright/trademark/sales mark infringements are not intended or implied.