Honda Car Forum

"SMS" <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote in message
news:45d0143e$0$27183$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
> Seth wrote:
>> Dealer is offering it to us for $29,438, so we're pretty happy with
>> that.
>
> That's about right if it's for the EX-L with the DVD, and a good deal if
> it's for the EX-L with the DVD + navigation, but it's about $1000 high for
> the plain EX-L.

Good to know.

I've since gotten an email offer from another Honda dealer I contacted
through edmunds.com for 27,989.

I'll see if my preferred dealer will match that.

"Elmo P. Shagnasty" <elmop@nastydesigns.com> wrote in message
news:elmop-9E22B5.06445612022007@nntp1.usenetserver.com...
> In article <6DQzh.259$rW7.186@newsfe10.lga>,
> "Seth" <seth_lermanNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I *know* that getting an Odyssey would not be a mistake. Same with the
>> Sienna. I don't think the R350 would be a mistake either, especially
>> since
>> it's only a 27month lease. What the hell could go wrong in 27 months?
>
> Well, hell, you could save yourself some dough and get another GM if
> you're going to dump it 27 months/27,000 miles.

Except the GM doesn't lease as well. The higher end cars lease much better
if that's the route I choose to take.

> I like the way you put it, though--the German car (which overall is a
> mistake) *should* be OK for 27 months...

I've had German in the past and my last 2 motorcycles have been German with
no issues.

"Woody" <TheDuck@pond.net> wrote in message
news:tR_zh.62785$wc5.48556@newssvr25.news.prodigy. net...
> Before you harp all the praise on the jap cars look at the 2002 Odyssey
> problems on www.odyclub.com . With their transmission, EGR, IAC valve and
> other problems they are far worse than the problems you had on the
> Venture. The reliability is no better there.

I'm not buying an '02 Odyssey...

"Woody" <TheDuck@pond.net> wrote in message
news:Td4Ah.26467$yC5.5900@newssvr27.news.prodigy.n et...
> But he is comparing it to a 2002. The problems he had then are also fixed
> in the 07 GM cars. The 07 Odyssey hasn't been out long enough to say the
> problems are fixed....

I'm comparing it against an '02 GM only because that's the only GM I
currently have. None of my previous GMs have felt reliable at high mileage.
Meanwhile I've had 3 Hondas do well for me well past the 100K mark. My
current '01 Accord is one of the ones that were plagued by transmission
problems. I'm now at 175,000 miles with no problems with the tranny and the
only problems were a wheel bearing ($225 to replace at 130,000 miles) and
now I need my EGR serviced.

"Dano58" <dan.dibiase@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1171296370.934789.11980@j27g2000cwj.googlegro ups.com...
> On Feb 11, 8:01 pm, "Seth" <seth_lermanNOS...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I haven't driven the Odyssey yet, but my wife went and drove it Thursday.
>> Today we both tried out the Sienna. Very nice. My wife liked the drive
>> better than the Odyssey. But the Sienna, in the XLE level, only comes 7
>> passenger.
>
> We did the same thing. I could have lived with either one (we were
> going to buy whichever had the better deal) but I actually thought the
> Odyssey had a little firmer ride and handled a little better.
> Everything about the Sienna was so light-feeling. I like a little
> 'heft' and feeling in my controls. That, the 8-seating capability and
> an excellent lease deal had us buy thr Odyssey.

I haven't driven the Odyssey yet, but I was very impressed with the way the
'07 Sienna rode. My wife has driven both and thought the Sienna was a
little better. But the 8 passenger seating has her swaying towards the
Odyssey along with my Accords track record.

> Since you have an AWD van now, I'm assuming you live in the snow belt
> somewhere...? So, unless you're talking about the 4matic version of
> the Benz, I'd pass on the R350.

Yeah, 70 miles north of NYC and I work in Lyndhurst, NJ. On the MB, yes,
4Matic. But even if we were to get the Sienna, not going for the AWD. Just
gonna get a spare set of rims to through some snow tires on. Those 5 days a
year where AWD is required over FWD, she can stay home like I do.

"Art" <begunaNOSPAMPLEASE@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:e_0Ah.727$tD2.102@newsread1.news.pas.earthlin k.net...
> We have a Odyssey 06 Touring model. Fine car though leather seats are a
> bit hard. Interior of Sienna reminded me of a Ford Taurus. Both are
> good cars. Read consumer reports review at library. For better handling
> get the Odyssey. For slightly softer ride get the Sienna. I would go
> with the better dealer if it was a toss up. Odyssey should be cheaper to
> take home feature for feature.

So far it is. The Sienna FWD, 7-pas XLE with the leather package is $31K
while a quote emailed to me earlier today has the 8-pas Odyssey EX-L at
27,989.

Wife likes the 8th seat in the Odyssey (as well as Honda's proven track
record with previous cars we've had) more than the electric tailgate (which
is included in the '07 Touring Odyssey).

Woody wrote:

> Before you harp all the praise on the jap cars look at the 2002 Odyssey
> problems on www.odyclub.com . With their transmission, EGR, IAC valve and
> other problems they are far worse than the problems you had on the Venture.
> The reliability is no better there.

Woody, would you please do this newsgroup a favor... SHUT THE HELL UP!!!

Once again, here's a reality check for you. Honda extended warranties
and/or issued recalls for many of those issues. If you look at long-term
reliability data in Consumer Reports or just about any other source, they
will say that Odyssey is still more reliable than any big 3 minivan.
Venture (since "replaced" by Upchucker, uh, I mean Uplander) is saddled with
a V6 that is prone to the expensive-to-fix intake manifold gasket problem
that GM still refuses to acknowledge. Ford and Crapsler minivans still have
higher rates of tranny failure than the Odyssey, and they never issued
recalls or extended warranties for them.

BTW, the OP is looking at a new Odyssey. The tranny issue was resolved by
the time it was redesigned for 2005.

The EX-L is easily the best deal in the Odyssey. I drive my elderly parents
around and I decided that I wanted power sliding doors for them (the right
decision) and rear hatches on vans get filthy fast so I wanted a power rear
door. For that you need the touring model. I regret not paying more and
gettting the rear view camera and navigation (my wife has navigation on her
accord and it is a pleasure). But the front and rear sensors are very
helpful.





"Seth" <seth_lermanNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:%y6Ah.41$Tw5.27@newsfe08.lga...
> "Art" <begunaNOSPAMPLEASE@mindspring.com> wrote in message
> news:e_0Ah.727$tD2.102@newsread1.news.pas.earthlin k.net...
>> We have a Odyssey 06 Touring model. Fine car though leather seats are a
>> bit hard. Interior of Sienna reminded me of a Ford Taurus. Both are
>> good cars. Read consumer reports review at library. For better handling
>> get the Odyssey. For slightly softer ride get the Sienna. I would go
>> with the better dealer if it was a toss up. Odyssey should be cheaper to
>> take home feature for feature.
>
> So far it is. The Sienna FWD, 7-pas XLE with the leather package is $31K
> while a quote emailed to me earlier today has the 8-pas Odyssey EX-L at
> 27,989.
>
> Wife likes the 8th seat in the Odyssey (as well as Honda's proven track
> record with previous cars we've had) more than the electric tailgate
> (which is included in the '07 Touring Odyssey).
>
>

On Feb 13, 2:59 am, "Art" <begunaNOSPAMPLE...@mindspring.com> wrote:
> The EX-L is easily the best deal in the Odyssey. I drive my elderly parents
> around and I decided that I wanted power sliding doors for them (the right
> decision) and rear hatches on vans get filthy fast so I wanted a power rear
> door. For that you need the touring model. I regret not paying more and
> gettting the rear view camera and navigation (my wife has navigation on her
> accord and it is a pleasure). But the front and rear sensors are very
> helpful.
>
> "Seth" <seth_lermanNOS...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:%y6Ah.41$Tw5.27@newsfe08.lga...
>
>
>
> > "Art" <begunaNOSPAMPLE...@mindspring.com> wrote in message
> >news:e_0Ah.727$tD2.102@newsread1.news.pas.earthli nk.net...
> >> We have a Odyssey 06 Touring model. Fine car though leather seats are a
> >> bit hard. Interior of Sienna reminded me of a Ford Taurus. Both are
> >> good cars. Read consumer reports review at library. For better handling
> >> get the Odyssey. For slightly softer ride get the Sienna. I would go
> >> with the better dealer if it was a toss up. Odyssey should be cheaper to
> >> take home feature for feature.
>
> > So far it is. The Sienna FWD, 7-pas XLE with the leather package is $31K
> > while a quote emailed to me earlier today has the 8-pas Odyssey EX-L at
> > 27,989.
>
> > Wife likes the 8th seat in the Odyssey (as well as Honda's proven track
> > record with previous cars we've had) more than the electric tailgate
> > (which is included in the '07 Touring Odyssey).- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Avoid the Mercedes. There reliability is horrible. Good tranny and
motor, but the electronics are straight out of the garbage.

Wow, tough choices --

I'm not much of a fan of the Sienna, but it's not a bad car. The
Mercedes is VERY nice and is a really cool car, but their reliability
can't match the Toyota or the Honda. But as Seth put it above, it
should last for 27 months. Keep in mind though, this means you'll have
to buy another car in a little over two years, so if you're in this
for the long run, the Mercedes probably wouldn't be your best choice.

Overall, I'd take the Honda. I find it more comfortable, it's larger,
and it'll fit eight passengers. That should be a good plus for your
wife, especially if you have kids. Plus, it sounds like it's cheaper.

Good luck! Overall, any of the three you choose will serve you well,
it's just down to details now...