Honda Car Forum | ![]() |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
In article <em4f14tvbnr2ij5fedfk5fiu001esrsg9u@4ax.com>, we@qw.net
says... > Any suggestions for a waterproof cover for an 07 TL, for under $100? > > TIA > A simple Google search revealed: $101.95 That's almost under $100!! http://www.autoanything.com/car-covers/20A10004A1.aspx $82.87 Fair outdoor protection http://www.carcoversdirect.com/produ.../car_cover/rea dy_fit/ACURA/2007/TL//3/ short ver: http://tinyurl.com/435qph 2 Outdoor covers under $100 http://www.global-accessories.com/products/index.phtml? prod_id=wolfcovers&cust_id=zq4mw&SYSTEM=storelink& SESSIONID=none&ACTION= Short Ver: http://tinyurl.com/4sazlv Hope that helps. -- I. Care Address fake until the SPAM goes away ;-} |
|
|||
|
Thanks, I have done numerous searches and looked at many online. I was hoping for some recommendations based on usage/experience. On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 15:39:44 -0700, I. Care <icare@spamthis.com> wrote: >In article <em4f14tvbnr2ij5fedfk5fiu001esrsg9u@4ax.com>, we@qw.net >says... >> Any suggestions for a waterproof cover for an 07 TL, for under $100? >> >> TIA >> >A simple Google search revealed: > >$101.95 That's almost under $100!! > >http://www.autoanything.com/car-covers/20A10004A1.aspx > >$82.87 Fair outdoor protection > >http://www.carcoversdirect.com/produ.../car_cover/rea >dy_fit/ACURA/2007/TL//3/ > >short ver: http://tinyurl.com/435qph > >2 Outdoor covers under $100 > >http://www.global-accessories.com/products/index.phtml? >prod_id=wolfcovers&cust_id=zq4mw&SYSTEM=storelink &SESSIONID=none&ACTION= > >Short Ver: http://tinyurl.com/4sazlv > >Hope that helps. |
|
|||
|
Waiving the right to remain silent, Luca <we@qw.net> said:
> Thanks, I have done numerous searches and looked at many online. I was > hoping for some recommendations based on usage/experience. You didn't say that... -- Larry J. - Remove spamtrap in ALLCAPS to e-mail "A lack of common sense is now considered a disability, with all the privileges that this entails." |
|
|||
|
Well if I was asking for suggestions, why would I want a suggestion of
"a Google search found..."? That is absurd. On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 19:41:48 GMT, Larry in AZ <usenet2@DE.LETE.THISljvideo.com> wrote: >Waiving the right to remain silent, Luca <we@qw.net> said: > >> Thanks, I have done numerous searches and looked at many online. I was >> hoping for some recommendations based on usage/experience. > >You didn't say that... |
|
|||
|
In article <t8nh14pop5g038527vu53arhcf71sphl8o@4ax.com>, we@qw.net
says... > Well if I was asking for suggestions, why would I want a suggestion of > "a Google search found..."? > > That is absurd. > > On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 19:41:48 GMT, Larry in AZ > <usenet2@DE.LETE.THISljvideo.com> wrote: > > >Waiving the right to remain silent, Luca <we@qw.net> said: > > > >> Thanks, I have done numerous searches and looked at many online. I was > >> hoping for some recommendations based on usage/experience. > > > >You didn't say that... > > You might think so, but, it is very common for people to ask for help and we find out they didn't even try to do a search. They just wanted everyone else to narrow it down for them so they wouldn't have to work too hard. Apparently then you are a victim of those other lazy people mentioned above :-) -- I. Care Address fake until the SPAM goes away ;-} |
|
|||
|
On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 16:57:24 -0400, Luca <we@qw.net> wrote:
>On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 19:41:48 GMT, Larry in AZ ><usenet2@DE.LETE.THISljvideo.com> wrote: > >>Waiving the right to remain silent, Luca <we@qw.net> said: >> >>> Thanks, I have done numerous searches and looked at many online. I was >>> hoping for some recommendations based on usage/experience. >> >>You didn't say that... >Well if I was asking for suggestions, why would I want a suggestion of >"a Google search found..."? > >That is absurd. <top posting cluelessness fixed> What is even more absurd is that it apparently didn't occur to you to use Google to search for *opinions* about products, as well as the products themselves. Now, that *is* absurd. -- Dan. |
|
|||
|
On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 19:18:05 -0400, Dean Dark
<ddrake@comcast.notthis.net> wrote: >On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 16:57:24 -0400, Luca <we@qw.net> wrote: > >>On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 19:41:48 GMT, Larry in AZ >><usenet2@DE.LETE.THISljvideo.com> wrote: >> >>>Waiving the right to remain silent, Luca <we@qw.net> said: >>> >>>> Thanks, I have done numerous searches and looked at many online. I was >>>> hoping for some recommendations based on usage/experience. >>> >>>You didn't say that... > >>Well if I was asking for suggestions, why would I want a suggestion of >>"a Google search found..."? >> >>That is absurd. > ><top posting cluelessness fixed> > >What is even more absurd is that it apparently didn't occur to you to >use Google to search for *opinions* about products, as well as the >products themselves. > >Now, that *is* absurd. And how did you arrive at that conclusion? Maybe I wanted more opinions than I found by Googling...you think maybe that could be the case? |
|
|||
|
On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 19:45:22 -0400, Luca <we@qw.net> wrote:
>On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 19:18:05 -0400, Dean Dark ><ddrake@comcast.notthis.net> wrote: > >>What is even more absurd is that it apparently didn't occur to you to >>use Google to search for *opinions* about products, as well as the >>products themselves. >> >>Now, that *is* absurd. > >And how did you arrive at that conclusion? > >Maybe I wanted more opinions than I found by Googling...you think >maybe that could be the case? As an earlier post by someone else said, "you didn't say that." Maybe it could be the case that you should learn from this little episode that you could do *much* better in how you frame your questions? Being explicit is likely to be way more productive than expecting the rest of us to be mucking findreaders... HTH, HAND, etc. -- Dan. |
|
|||
|
Waiving the right to remain silent, Luca <we@qw.net> said:
> Well if I was asking for suggestions, why would I want a suggestion of > "a Google search found..."? > > That is absurd. Perhaps, but it wouldn't be the first time that someone asks others to do their searching work for them. > On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 19:41:48 GMT, Larry in AZ ><usenet2@DE.LETE.THISljvideo.com> wrote: > >>Waiving the right to remain silent, Luca <we@qw.net> said: >> >>> Thanks, I have done numerous searches and looked at many online. I was >>> hoping for some recommendations based on usage/experience. >> >>You didn't say that... -- Larry J. - Remove spamtrap in ALLCAPS to e-mail "A lack of common sense is now considered a disability, with all the privileges that this entails." |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| sunroof cover | Kevin | Honda 2 | 4 | 23 Nov 2007 07:42 pm |
| are halo projector headlights waterproof? | Vincent C | Honda Technical | 4 | 08 Sep 2007 03:32 am |
| Is the Element's interior completely waterproof? | mah@reddotcommunications.com | Honda 2 | 2 | 27 Jul 2006 10:38 am |
| ISO 06 RSX cover but not from dealer | lilrdgsr | Acura | 2 | 11 Jul 2006 03:31 pm |
| Waterproof Remote? | MLD | Honda 2 | 0 | 02 Mar 2005 06:44 pm |