Honda Car Forum

yes

"Grolsch" <a3a44058@telus.net> wrote in
news:bRh7f.33240$y_1.16688@edtnps89:

>
>
>
>


Acura. What do you expect me to say?

Actually, my mechanic of 25 years would say the Subaru. He's a major Subaru
nut and even ice-races old XTs. He likes them because of their 4WD.

--
TeGGeR®

The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/

"TeGGeR®" <tegger@tegger.c0m> wrote in
news:Xns96FAC488DA506tegger@207.14.113.17:

> "Grolsch" <a3a44058@telus.net> wrote in
> news:bRh7f.33240$y_1.16688@edtnps89:
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> Acura. What do you expect me to say?
>
> Actually, my mechanic of 25 years would say the Subaru. He's a major
> Subaru nut and even ice-races old XTs. He likes them because of their
> 4WD.
>

The WRX STI is a rally car,will have a rougher ride than the Acuras,but a
lot better accelleration and braking. Honda products have high quality
ergonomics,a "same feeling" constant across all models.

WRX is based on the 4 dr Impreza,a basic quality auto.

All said;it depends on what YOU want in a car.(as always)
YMMV.

--
Jim Yanik
jyanik
at
kua.net

I have a 2004 Tl and a 2002 WRX (not the STi)

The TL is more comfortable and is a great touring car with good gas mileage
on the highway. It is larger and comfortable for 4 people.

The WRX is more fun to drive, but on a long trip the hard and narrow seats
can become very uncomfortable.

In the winter (I live in Edmonton) the WRX wins, but the TL with traction
control and with winter tires does a good job as well.

I drive the TL and my wife drives the WRX.

They are both very good cars, but have very different styles.



"Grolsch" <a3a44058@telus.net> wrote in message
news:bRh7f.33240$y_1.16688@edtnps89...
>
>
>
>