Honda Car Forum |
|
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Social Groups | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Honda Parts Search |
|
| ||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
In another post, someone mentioned that the first generation TL's ( 93 I
think thru 98) have pretty much a 1990 on Accord type transmission which were very good and that this first generation of TL's don't have transmission problems. Does this apply to both the 2.5 and the 3.2? I've got a 3.2 which blew at about 90k and although the rebuild has held 25k and two years I'm nervous about it. It just dosen't feel as smooth as my old V6 Camry. Also, my 98 TL 3.2's engine sits straight ahead, like in a rear wheel drive car, not turned sideways like generation #2. Is it still basically an Accord transmission? Finally - why is my engine oriented straight ahead? It must have cost more to build it that way. It's torque doesn't see affect the steering much as I've felt on some FWD's but if it was better then why aren't they still building them that way? |
|
|||
|
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 18:45:41 -0400, "Stan Dowiat" <standowiat@alltel.net> wrote:
>In another post, someone mentioned that the first generation TL's ( 93 I >think thru 98) have pretty much a 1990 on Accord type transmission which >were very good and that this first generation of TL's don't have >transmission problems. > >Does this apply to both the 2.5 and the 3.2? I've got a 3.2 which blew at >about 90k and although the rebuild has held 25k and two years I'm nervous >about it. It just dosen't feel as smooth as my old V6 Camry. > >Also, my 98 TL 3.2's engine sits straight ahead, like in a rear wheel drive >car, not turned sideways like generation #2. Is it still basically an >Accord transmission? > >Finally - why is my engine oriented straight ahead? It must have cost more >to build it that way. It's torque doesn't see affect the steering much as >I've felt on some FWD's but if it was better then why aren't they still >building them that way? My '98 2.5TL also has the 5 cylinder engine mounted fore and aft. The car is not wide enough for a sideways straight 5 cyl. 74K miles, no problems with anything! (knocking on wood!) I don't think the 1st Gen TLs are related to Accords. I'm quite happy with mine and hope to keep it for several more years. It's under warranty for a couple more years / 100K miles. Enjoy, Tim Wisner www.wisner.us |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 8th Generation Civic | Alex | Honda 2 | 1 | 03 Jan 2006 01:19 am |
| next generation Civic | Paul Bielec | Honda 3 | 2 | 18 Jan 2004 05:08 am |
| First and Second Generation Hondas? | Andrew Smit | Honda 2 | 8 | 09 Jan 2004 02:42 am |
| What can I expect in next generation of RLs | broye54 | Acura | 0 | 31 Dec 2003 08:29 pm |
| Ist generation link | Stuart Gordon | Acura | 3 | 14 Jul 2003 01:40 pm |