Honda Car Forum


 

Go Back   Honda Car Forum - Accord Parts Civic Tuning Acura Racing > Honda Acura > Acura


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 31 Aug 2004, 05:45 pm
Stan Dowiat
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default First generation TL Tranny

In another post, someone mentioned that the first generation TL's ( 93 I
think thru 98) have pretty much a 1990 on Accord type transmission which
were very good and that this first generation of TL's don't have
transmission problems.

Does this apply to both the 2.5 and the 3.2? I've got a 3.2 which blew at
about 90k and although the rebuild has held 25k and two years I'm nervous
about it. It just dosen't feel as smooth as my old V6 Camry.

Also, my 98 TL 3.2's engine sits straight ahead, like in a rear wheel drive
car, not turned sideways like generation #2. Is it still basically an
Accord transmission?

Finally - why is my engine oriented straight ahead? It must have cost more
to build it that way. It's torque doesn't see affect the steering much as
I've felt on some FWD's but if it was better then why aren't they still
building them that way?




Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 01 Sep 2004, 08:05 pm
Tim Wisner
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: First generation TL Tranny

On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 18:45:41 -0400, "Stan Dowiat" <standowiat@alltel.net> wrote:

>In another post, someone mentioned that the first generation TL's ( 93 I
>think thru 98) have pretty much a 1990 on Accord type transmission which
>were very good and that this first generation of TL's don't have
>transmission problems.
>
>Does this apply to both the 2.5 and the 3.2? I've got a 3.2 which blew at
>about 90k and although the rebuild has held 25k and two years I'm nervous
>about it. It just dosen't feel as smooth as my old V6 Camry.
>
>Also, my 98 TL 3.2's engine sits straight ahead, like in a rear wheel drive
>car, not turned sideways like generation #2. Is it still basically an
>Accord transmission?
>
>Finally - why is my engine oriented straight ahead? It must have cost more
>to build it that way. It's torque doesn't see affect the steering much as
>I've felt on some FWD's but if it was better then why aren't they still
>building them that way?


My '98 2.5TL also has the 5 cylinder engine mounted fore and aft. The car is
not wide enough for a sideways straight 5 cyl.

74K miles, no problems with anything! (knocking on wood!) I don't think the
1st Gen TLs are related to Accords. I'm quite happy with mine and hope to keep
it for several more years. It's under warranty for a couple more years / 100K
miles.
Enjoy,

Tim Wisner

www.wisner.us
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
8th Generation Civic Alex Honda 2 1 03 Jan 2006 01:19 am
next generation Civic Paul Bielec Honda 3 2 18 Jan 2004 05:08 am
First and Second Generation Hondas? Andrew Smit Honda 2 8 09 Jan 2004 02:42 am
What can I expect in next generation of RLs broye54 Acura 0 31 Dec 2003 08:29 pm
Ist generation link Stuart Gordon Acura 3 14 Jul 2003 01:40 pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:34 pm.


Attribution:
Honda News | Autoblog
Powered by Yahoo Answers

Archive: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457



Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.3.2 © 2009, Crawlability, Inc.
HondaCarForum.com is not affiliated with Honda Motor Company in any way. Honda Motor Company does not sponsor, support, or endorse HondaCarForum.com in any way. Copyright/trademark/sales mark infringements are not intended or implied.