Honda Car Forum


 

Go Back   Honda Car Forum - Accord Parts Civic Tuning Acura Racing > Honda Acura > Acura


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 26 Nov 2003, 11:35 am
rll
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default 2004 Acura TL Review - 6 weeks behind the wheel

Pros:
I have had my TL with navigation for 6 weeks now. Overall, I am very happy with it. The
electronic gadgets are fun and the overall ride quality is excellent. I also appreciate the quiet
cabin.

Cons:
The gas mileage has been a bit erratic. From a high of 27 to a low of 18; averages about 22-23
mpg. That's a bit lower than I expected. Also, over time you start the car, you are required to
press OK on the touch screen to view the navigation screen. There is a warning that you are
supposed to read before using the navigation. It has really begun to annoy me. I wish someone at
Acura would eliminate that from the software boot up.

Overall Review:
I have always owned manual shift cars. I have an NSX with the 6 speed, so I thought I would buy
an automatic for a change of pace and I thought I can always drive the NSX when I want to shift,
but even though the TL has a 5 speed automatic with the manual shift mode, it is not well
implemented. I find the transmission too often searching for the correct gear. And the
auto-manual mode is nearly useless; It won't hold 1st gear, it automatically shifts to 2nd. Also,
the transmission lags too long after you shift to the next gear. I guess I am just a manual
transmission guy at heart. I am disappointed that Acura didn't design a better shifting
algorithm, or offer a sport-shift mode.

I would be interested in other's thoughts.

- Russ in SB
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 26 Nov 2003, 11:45 pm
Curly
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 2004 Acura TL Review - 6 weeks behind the wheel



> I would be interested in other's thoughts.


Here is my thought:

- Russ (the Engineer) in SB


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 26 Nov 2003, 11:46 pm
Curly
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 2004 Acura TL Review - 6 weeks behind the wheel

> I would be interested in other's thoughts.

Here is my thought:

- Russ (the Engineer) in SB


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 27 Nov 2003, 01:03 pm
The Other One
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 2004 Acura TL Review - 6 weeks behind the wheel

On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 04:46:59 GMT, "Curly"
<XeveryidiwantiskenX@yahoo.com> wrote:

>> I would be interested in other's thoughts.

>
>Here is my thought:
>
> - Russ (the Engineer) in SB
>

Wow, such a profound thought you had it twice. I guess you had that
thought, and then forgot it, and then had it again.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 27 Nov 2003, 11:19 pm
Pete
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 2004 Acura TL Review - 6 weeks behind the wheel

I have had mine for about 2 weeks. Comparing it to my '01 TL , I find it
quicker and much nicer inside. The 1-2 auto shift in triptonic mode is daft,
I know, but its been like that since '00 I believe. I too have erratic
fuel mileage, likely a function of the way I drive. Yes, that damn
disclaimer every time you start the car is very annoying. My biggest
disappointment is the ride. There's a lot of road feel through the steering
wheel and the ride can be harsh at times - mind you it corners exceptionally
well for a front drive car. Don't you find that you feel too much of the
imperfections in the road? Candidly, I find the thing rides like my '78
Camaro that I had as a teenager.


"rll" <rlombard@westmont.edu> wrote in message
newsD4xb.8598$9O5.6378@fed1read06...
Pros:
I have had my TL with navigation for 6 weeks now. Overall, I am very happy
with it. The
electronic gadgets are fun and the overall ride quality is excellent. I also
appreciate the quiet
cabin.

Cons:
The gas mileage has been a bit erratic. From a high of 27 to a low of 18;
averages about 22-23
mpg. That's a bit lower than I expected. Also, over time you start the car,
you are required to
press OK on the touch screen to view the navigation screen. There is a
warning that you are
supposed to read before using the navigation. It has really begun to annoy
me. I wish someone at
Acura would eliminate that from the software boot up.

Overall Review:
I have always owned manual shift cars. I have an NSX with the 6 speed, so I
thought I would buy
an automatic for a change of pace and I thought I can always drive the NSX
when I want to shift,
but even though the TL has a 5 speed automatic with the manual shift mode,
it is not well
implemented. I find the transmission too often searching for the correct
gear. And the
auto-manual mode is nearly useless; It won't hold 1st gear, it automatically
shifts to 2nd. Also,
the transmission lags too long after you shift to the next gear. I guess I
am just a manual
transmission guy at heart. I am disappointed that Acura didn't design a
better shifting
algorithm, or offer a sport-shift mode.

I would be interested in other's thoughts.

- Russ in SB


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 28 Nov 2003, 12:06 am
john
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 2004 Acura TL Review - 6 weeks behind the wheel



Pete wrote:

> I have had mine for about 2 weeks. Comparing it to my '01 TL , I find it
> quicker and much nicer inside. The 1-2 auto shift in triptonic mode is daft,
> I know, but its been like that since '00 I believe. I too have erratic
> fuel mileage, likely a function of the way I drive. Yes, that damn
> disclaimer every time you start the car is very annoying. My biggest
> disappointment is the ride. There's a lot of road feel through the steering
> wheel and the ride can be harsh at times - mind you it corners exceptionally
> well for a front drive car. Don't you find that you feel too much of the
> imperfections in the road? Candidly, I find the thing rides like my '78




hehehe, go try the RSX-S to feel the imperfections of the road... ;-)

-john


> Camaro that I had as a teenager.
>
>
> "rll" <rlombard@westmont.edu> wrote in message
> newsD4xb.8598$9O5.6378@fed1read06...
> Pros:
> I have had my TL with navigation for 6 weeks now. Overall, I am very happy
> with it. The
> electronic gadgets are fun and the overall ride quality is excellent. I also
> appreciate the quiet
> cabin.
>
> Cons:
> The gas mileage has been a bit erratic. From a high of 27 to a low of 18;
> averages about 22-23
> mpg. That's a bit lower than I expected. Also, over time you start the car,
> you are required to
> press OK on the touch screen to view the navigation screen. There is a
> warning that you are
> supposed to read before using the navigation. It has really begun to annoy
> me. I wish someone at
> Acura would eliminate that from the software boot up.
>
> Overall Review:
> I have always owned manual shift cars. I have an NSX with the 6 speed, so I
> thought I would buy
> an automatic for a change of pace and I thought I can always drive the NSX
> when I want to shift,
> but even though the TL has a 5 speed automatic with the manual shift mode,
> it is not well
> implemented. I find the transmission too often searching for the correct
> gear. And the
> auto-manual mode is nearly useless; It won't hold 1st gear, it automatically
> shifts to 2nd. Also,
> the transmission lags too long after you shift to the next gear. I guess I
> am just a manual
> transmission guy at heart. I am disappointed that Acura didn't design a
> better shifting
> algorithm, or offer a sport-shift mode.
>
> I would be interested in other's thoughts.
>
> - Russ in SB
>
>
>


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 28 Nov 2003, 06:36 pm
Rob G
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 2004 Acura TL Review - 6 weeks behind the wheel

Feel the imperfections? Heck feel the car FOLLOW the imperfections! I was
driving 70KPH
on a road today and the car was all over the place because of road
imperfections.



--


Rob

"john" <rsx1877@mistralaero.com> wrote in message
news:3FC6D7D3.5010206@mistralaero.com...
>
> hehehe, go try the RSX-S to feel the imperfections of the road... ;-)
>
> -john
>



Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 29 Nov 2003, 02:50 am
john
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 2004 Acura TL Review - 6 weeks behind the wheel

I know Rob I have owned an RSX-S for 2 years now...

I also know it is recognized as jumping around like a rabbit on bumpy roads.

Let's face it, it behaves like a formula car, I have said it many times
before on this ng. You won't see Indy cars or F1s driving over road
imperfections because they can't handle it.

The RSX-S is the extreme example but it is general nature of Honda
products to have stiff suspension. So although I have never tried the TL
I could imagine it is stiff compared to other cars people might be used
to drive. The TSX was smoother than the RSX-S but still pretty stiff.

I like the stiff suspension of the RSX-S but I have to drive it like a
formula car going around man holes and slowing down at 20 MPH on bumpy
roads ;-(

Look elsewhere, Cadillac gets good reviews for the real-time adjustable
suspension. About Subaru WRX ? ;-))

Hondas have a reputation of jumping around on bumpy roads and Honda
models generally have stiffer suspension than the competition in the
respective models they are competing with. (read better track
performance at the cost of lost of performance on bad roads)

The RSX-S is definetly not a rally car, more a track car and tracks have
very few imperfections. For the TL, I really do not know, but I would
bet it has a stiffer suspension than the Nissan Maxima.

I have tried VW wolfberg special edition and the suspension felt really
smooth compared to the RSX-S.

-john

G wrote:

> Feel the imperfections? Heck feel the car FOLLOW the imperfections! I was
> driving 70KPH
> on a road today and the car was all over the place because of road
> imperfections.
>
>
>
>


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 29 Nov 2003, 06:47 am
salligator
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 2004 Acura TL Review - 6 weeks behind the wheel


"john" <rsx1877@mistralaero.com> wrote in message
news:3FC6D7D3.5010206@mistralaero.com...
>
>
> Pete wrote:
>
> > I have had mine for about 2 weeks. Comparing it to my '01 TL , I find

it
> > quicker and much nicer inside. The 1-2 auto shift in triptonic mode is

daft,
> > I know, but its been like that since '00 I believe. I too have erratic
> > fuel mileage, likely a function of the way I drive. Yes, that damn
> > disclaimer every time you start the car is very annoying. My biggest
> > disappointment is the ride. There's a lot of road feel through the

steering
> > wheel and the ride can be harsh at times - mind you it corners

exceptionally
> > well for a front drive car. Don't you find that you feel too much of the
> > imperfections in the road? Candidly, I find the thing rides like my '78

>
>
>
> hehehe, go try the RSX-S to feel the imperfections of the road... ;-)
>
> -john
>
>
> > Camaro that I had as a teenager.
> >
> >
> > "rll" <rlombard@westmont.edu> wrote in message
> > newsD4xb.8598$9O5.6378@fed1read06...
> > Pros:
> > I have had my TL with navigation for 6 weeks now. Overall, I am very

happy
> > with it. The
> > electronic gadgets are fun and the overall ride quality is excellent. I

also
> > appreciate the quiet
> > cabin.
> >
> > Cons:
> > The gas mileage has been a bit erratic. From a high of 27 to a low of

18;
> > averages about 22-23
> > mpg. That's a bit lower than I expected. Also, over time you start the

car,
> > you are required to
> > press OK on the touch screen to view the navigation screen. There is a
> > warning that you are
> > supposed to read before using the navigation. It has really begun to

annoy
> > me. I wish someone at
> > Acura would eliminate that from the software boot up.
> >
> > Overall Review:
> > I have always owned manual shift cars. I have an NSX with the 6 speed,

so I
> > thought I would buy
> > an automatic for a change of pace and I thought I can always drive the

NSX
> > when I want to shift,
> > but even though the TL has a 5 speed automatic with the manual shift

mode,
> > it is not well
> > implemented. I find the transmission too often searching for the correct
> > gear. And the
> > auto-manual mode is nearly useless; It won't hold 1st gear, it

automatically
> > shifts to 2nd. Also,
> > the transmission lags too long after you shift to the next gear. I guess

I
> > am just a manual
> > transmission guy at heart. I am disappointed that Acura didn't design a
> > better shifting
> > algorithm, or offer a sport-shift mode.
> >
> > I would be interested in other's thoughts.
> >
> > - Russ in SB
> >
> >
> >

>

I have a 2003 TL-S. Certain roads really shake the car up a great deal.
There is one intersection that I had to go through every day for 2 months.
Unless I went thru it at 1 mph the whole car rattled like crazy. No other
car in my family rattled like that.

It turned out that I took the car into the dealer on warrantee and they
spent 3 hours doing a lot of work tighening everything.


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 01 Dec 2003, 03:44 am
Dick
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 2004 Acura TL Review - 6 weeks behind the wheel

My 2003 Accord Coupe is the same way especially in cold weather when the
suspension really starts riding harshly. I have a rough road in front
of my house so I have to listen to the CD cover rattle and vibrate for
about the first ten minutes of the ride. They have tried 3 different
times to fix it but no luck it just keeps coming back,

Dick

salligator wrote:
> "john" <rsx1877@mistralaero.com> wrote in message
> news:3FC6D7D3.5010206@mistralaero.com...
>
>>
>>Pete wrote:
>>
>>
>>>I have had mine for about 2 weeks. Comparing it to my '01 TL , I find

>
> it
>
>>>quicker and much nicer inside. The 1-2 auto shift in triptonic mode is

>
> daft,
>
>>>I know, but its been like that since '00 I believe. I too have erratic
>>>fuel mileage, likely a function of the way I drive. Yes, that damn
>>>disclaimer every time you start the car is very annoying. My biggest
>>>disappointment is the ride. There's a lot of road feel through the

>
> steering
>
>>>wheel and the ride can be harsh at times - mind you it corners

>
> exceptionally
>
>>>well for a front drive car. Don't you find that you feel too much of the
>>>imperfections in the road? Candidly, I find the thing rides like my '78

>>
>>
>>
>>hehehe, go try the RSX-S to feel the imperfections of the road... ;-)
>>
>>-john
>>
>>
>>
>>>Camaro that I had as a teenager.
>>>
>>>
>>>"rll" <rlombard@westmont.edu> wrote in message
>>>newsD4xb.8598$9O5.6378@fed1read06...
>>>Pros:
>>>I have had my TL with navigation for 6 weeks now. Overall, I am very

>
> happy
>
>>>with it. The
>>>electronic gadgets are fun and the overall ride quality is excellent. I

>
> also
>
>>>appreciate the quiet
>>>cabin.
>>>
>>>Cons:
>>>The gas mileage has been a bit erratic. From a high of 27 to a low of

>
> 18;
>
>>>averages about 22-23
>>>mpg. That's a bit lower than I expected. Also, over time you start the

>
> car,
>
>>>you are required to
>>>press OK on the touch screen to view the navigation screen. There is a
>>>warning that you are
>>>supposed to read before using the navigation. It has really begun to

>
> annoy
>
>>>me. I wish someone at
>>>Acura would eliminate that from the software boot up.
>>>
>>>Overall Review:
>>>I have always owned manual shift cars. I have an NSX with the 6 speed,

>
> so I
>
>>>thought I would buy
>>>an automatic for a change of pace and I thought I can always drive the

>
> NSX
>
>>>when I want to shift,
>>>but even though the TL has a 5 speed automatic with the manual shift

>
> mode,
>
>>>it is not well
>>>implemented. I find the transmission too often searching for the correct
>>>gear. And the
>>>auto-manual mode is nearly useless; It won't hold 1st gear, it

>
> automatically
>
>>>shifts to 2nd. Also,
>>>the transmission lags too long after you shift to the next gear. I guess

>
> I
>
>>>am just a manual
>>>transmission guy at heart. I am disappointed that Acura didn't design a
>>>better shifting
>>>algorithm, or offer a sport-shift mode.
>>>
>>>I would be interested in other's thoughts.
>>>
>>> - Russ in SB
>>>
>>>
>>>

>>

> I have a 2003 TL-S. Certain roads really shake the car up a great deal.
> There is one intersection that I had to go through every day for 2 months.
> Unless I went thru it at 1 mph the whole car rattled like crazy. No other
> car in my family rattled like that.
>
> It turned out that I took the car into the dealer on warrantee and they
> spent 3 hours doing a lot of work tighening everything.
>
>


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2004 Acura TL Vs. 2004 Infinity G35 Sedan Sonoman Acura 41 23 Jan 2005 12:10 pm
Having wheel fit problems - 2004 Accord EX V6 Custers Honda 3 2 05 Jan 2005 10:18 am
2004 TL review James Enman Acura 1 29 Apr 2004 06:29 pm
2004 Acura TL or Audi 2004 1.8T Quattro?? Pumba Honda 2 2 23 Apr 2004 04:19 pm
2004 Civic Wheel Specs. Skid Honda 3 0 15 Apr 2004 07:46 pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:02 am.


Attribution:
Honda News | Autoblog
Powered by Yahoo Answers

Archive: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458



Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.3.2 © 2009, Crawlability, Inc.
HondaCarForum.com is not affiliated with Honda Motor Company in any way. Honda Motor Company does not sponsor, support, or endorse HondaCarForum.com in any way. Copyright/trademark/sales mark infringements are not intended or implied.