Honda Car Forum |
|
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Social Groups | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Honda Parts Search |
|
| ||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
turbo would be better for an rsx and would be faster. out of the hole, the supercharger would take off faster because of turbo lag but overall, the turbo will give you more hp and more opportunites to modify the turbo. also, turbo just goes great with a 4 cylinder engine.
|
|
|||
|
Turbo pros: is more fuel economic, delivers a lot more power in the high endTurbo cons: more dangerous if not tuned and maintained properly, turbo lag gets a thumbsdownS/C pros: cheaper, easier to install, linear gain throughout the powerbandS/C cons: you max out power at about 375whp, excessive wheel hop in 1st gear (motor mounts help with this)
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| i need a ecu chip for my 95 honda accord, its turboed and an auto? | streetkingscc | Honda Technical | 3 | 30 May 2008 10:16 am |
| what would be faster in the end a fully built all motor with high compression or a turboed fully | Brandon B | Honda Technical | 7 | 02 Sep 2007 03:10 pm |
| What would be faster, an 04 WRX stock, or a 96 Acura integra GSR turboed at 7psi? | Jaime P | Acura Technical | 7 | 29 Aug 2007 03:46 pm |