Honda Car Forum

why would somone buy a rsx? when you just could buy a Celica and dont say because the RSX is faster because if you cared about speed you would not have bought the RSX in the first place!you would buy a GTO or EVO.i think you RSX driver just cant get a Celica gt-s so you bought a honda just like everyone else

i bet they prefer a honda over a toyota or a gto or evo

i bet they prefer a honda over a toyota or a gto or evo

the RSX is the only car they could get at the time,the Celica is way nicer inside and out

The Celica is garbage inside and out compared to the RSX.

The RSX looks better (less trendy) and is more fun to drive.

The Celica / GT models today is an optional car. I think the RSX has a bit more room inside for passengers. Both celica Gt and Rsx have good aftermarket parts.TRUTH AND ONLY proven on the STREETS.The RSX is Just build up off the Reputation of the ACURA INTEGRA Type- R, GS and GSR's popularity.and this new car with a new Vtec engine for the tuners to play with and race on the streets is Prime.RSX is todays Integra. if Celica Gt had of spun off the fame and shared the parts of the SUPRA Twin Turbo with the world famous 2JTZGE engine Please belive that we would see just as many Celicas on the streets as Acuras and Hondas.

Dont get me wrong, but ive driven both these cars. I would tell you the Celica, is pretty cool to drive, since it's very compact. But the RSX is more fun to drive inside out. Im talking about the type-S (USDM) and Type-R (JDM) RSX/Integra, not the base model. The base's VTEC is more of an ecomonial VTEC. So no fun in that.And no, I wouldnt by a GTO if i cared about speed. Maybe an Evo, but i would stick with an NSX or integra type-r.The RSX-S is better for some people, because we can tune and race how we want to. But I see your trying to hate on Honda? What about the S2000, or the NSX, or the Type-R trims? RSX is better for gas, looks, fun, relibility and resale value.So please dont assume, because youll make an a$s out of you and me.