Well said.

Why anyone would spend $27k on an Accord is beyond me. For that price you
could get something much more refined.

"SoCalMike" <mikein562athotmail@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:8sbZa.71882$cF.22903@rwcrnsc53...
>
> "Pete" <escape2music@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:bh3duf$eul$1@news.onet.pl...
> >
> > "John Horner" <jthorner@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > news:vjaaies7n3uffc@corp.supernews.com...
> > > About one month ago I purchased a 2003 Accord V6 with navigation,
which
> > > means with every factory installed option available. So far I have
not
> > been
> > > impressed by the supposedly amazing level of quality Honda is reputed
to
> > > provide.
> >
> > Stephen Bigelow, George Macdonald, are you reading this? Not sure if
you
> > can chalk it up to the "Most Reliable" thread we had here 2 days ago,
but
> it
> > certainly speaks of quality of today's Hondas. The quality of my '00
> Accord
> > EX-V6 was just as bad. Air leaks, water leaks, squeaks and sunroof
> rattles,
> > pulsating/dimming dashboard lights, unevenly aligned cabin trim pieces,
> > vibrating outside mirrors. Certainly not what I was expecting after
> hearing
> > about the great Honda "quality."
>
> apparently you noticed none of that on your test drive. you almost make it
> sound like it was built by ford.
> >
> > But as I mentioned before, all makers turn out a certain number of
> lemons -
> > quality control is not 100% perfect. I suppose I just had bad luck. If
> > only that car was fun to drive, I would have let those finish
> imperfections
> > slide. I guess I should have test-driven it more extensively. You live
> and
> > learn...
>
> you bought a family car when you really wanted a sports car, so you
niggle
> all the petty details to justify why you hate it so much.
>
> next time, buy what you *like*
>
>