jim beam wrote:
> Grumpy AuContraire wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Michael Pardee wrote:
>>
>>> "Eye In The Sky" <ruleman@> wrote in message
>>> news:Ia2dnb2YvtzDutvbnZ2dnUVZ_oSnnZ2d@comcast.com. ..
>>>
>>>> Just bought me a new V6 Accord sedan (EX-L trim line) -- very nice car!
>>>>
>>>> The supplied MANFACTURER maintenance booklet does not list the
>>>> MANUFACTURER-recommended time/mileage intervals for various
>>>> services. However, there is a separate booklet with
>>>> DEALER-recommended service intervals. I asked the dealer about that
>>>> and he said there are no MFR recommended intervals, just ones from
>>>> the DEALER.
>>>>
>>>> My experience over the years with various brands of cars is that
>>>> dealers generally recommend more frequent service intevals than the
>>>> manufacturer does. No big surprise there since the dealer usually
>>>> does the service.
>>>>
>>>> So what's the deal? Has American Honda quit making service
>>>> recommendations for their vehicles??
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Dunno - yesterday I was checking my daughter's '93 Accord fine manual
>>> for the timing belt change interval. It's 90K miles, but imagine my
>>> surprise to see it noted as "recommended only."
>>>
>>> Mike
>>
>>
>> Hell, I still haven't found the officially specified timing belt
>> change for either my '82 or '83 Civic though I'm convinced that it
>> should be every 60K.
>>
>> JT
>>
>>
> you still get belts for that ok?


Sure do.

In fact, parts are incredibly cheap for the most part as I like to
maintain a certain amount of "stock" for future usage. I just scored a
set of new strut catridges on eBay for a mere $14.99...

JT