On Wed, 24 Aug 2005 10:59:51 -0400, flobert <nomail@here.NOT> puked:

>On Wed, 24 Aug 2005 12:44:07 GMT, lab~rat <chase@cheese.net> wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 23 Aug 2005 17:12:21 -0400, flobert <nomail@here.NOT> puked:
>>
>>>On Tue, 23 Aug 2005 19:53:23 GMT, lab~rat <chase@cheese.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Tue, 23 Aug 2005 15:21:20 GMT, "Michael Selin"
>>>><mselin@worldnet.att.net> puked:
>>>>
>>>>>Hi
>>>>>Anyone out there have any big complaints or comments about the Honda s2000.
>>>>>I am close to going for one over a more pratical WRX si or EVO.
>>>>>PS: I am old and drive like an old fart most of the time, but who can
>>>>>resist a re visit to the speed of the mid 1960's
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>I've driven one and like it. Ergonomically it fits me well. I have
>>>>been toying with the idea with buying one and the only real issue I
>>>>have is that it is 100% made in Japan.
>>>
>>>why is that an issue?
>>
>>I generally only buy vehicles from N. America. You know, keep it in
>>the family...
>
>Socialist labour unions, artificially making vehicles more expensive
>by forcing wage deals for people at a level not in line with their
>levels of education and experiance.
>
>I have quie a few friends who've got family working in car assembly
>plants elsewhere - the ford Escort/jag x-type plant in liverpol, and
>the vauxhall plant in ellesmere port (which includes the GM V6 engine
>plant) and they wish they were being paid as much as the unionised US
>auto assemblers. I looked into applying for work at the taurus plant
>in atlanta, but i really didn't like the working enviroment there. A
>very bad atmosphere. I'll go for a japan-assembled car any time - the
>work enviroment is much better, less hostiility in the air, less
>friction between the tiers, and people work better in such
>enviroments.

Good. That'll work out fine for you.
--
lab~rat >:-)
Do you want polite or do you want sincere?