Thus spake "MJS" <xxxr@rogers.com> :

>Have owned both. Accord is a driver's car. Camry is like driving your front
>room. One is fun, the other will get you there in perfect comfort. Take
>your choice....

When we bought the 2007 in Jan 2007, the Accord kind of sucked. But
with the 2009s, the Camry is nice, but the Accord has caught up in
some ways.

For the money and the specific audience, though, the Camry is still a
slight winnder. Both are aimed at that "typical" upper middle class
that are almost ready to buy a Lexus or an Infinity. We almost bought
an IS250, but the back seat was only a tad bigger than my (now
lamented) 308GT4. Say four bags of groceries or two small coworkers
headed to the sandwich shop 3 miles away.

>
>
>
>
>"tww1491" <twaugh5@cox.net> wrote in message
>news:exiJm.24927$1g6.14956@newsfe10.iad...
>>
>> "mri 1397" <mri1397@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:a05e1b28-768d-41a4-ba51-e064b0434b39@z3g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
>>> accord vs camry .
>>>
>>> opinions please
>>
>> If you believe the GM commercials, Malibu is better. Of course, I own and
>> Accord and would not have it any other way.

If you believe the GM commercials, the Malibu gets better mileage. If
you believe the satisfaction rankings, the Malibu comes out behind.

>>
>
--

- dillon I am not invalid

"Always shoot first. At the very least you'll
distract the guy enough to make the second one count"
-- Lazurus Long