On 2009-10-21, Clete <lecllaij@halifax.ca> wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 07:39:59 +0100, "Al Reynolds"
><ajr-news@bat400.com> wrote:
>
>>"pws" <pwshelton@austin.rr.com> wrote:
>>> I just received a white 1995 Honda Accord, the EX I believe.
>>
>>Good cars. I have the UK equivalent to the 94-97 Wagon EX - I've just
>>passed 188000 miles and it still drives very well.
>>
>>> It has only 77,000 miles on it and had the entire A/C replaced just over a
>>> year ago.
>>> The records show a regular service every 3 months for oil/filter and a
>>> complete tune-up at least once a year.
>>> The timing belt was replaced at 60K miles, and it has almost new Pirelli
>>> P5 tires on it. This was grandma's car.
>>
>>How long ago was the timing belt? Remember there is a time limit on these
>>as well as a mileage limit. Given it looks like you have a nice condition
>>car here it might be a wise precaution to get the timing belt done.
>
> Look above.

That doesn't say WHEN, it just says the mileage. Timing belts need to
be changed at a specific mileage/age, whichever comes first.


--
Joe - Linux User #449481/Ubuntu User #19733
joe at hits - buffalo dot com
"Hate is baggage, life is too short to go around pissed off all the
time..." - Danny, American History X