Tegger wrote:
> "T.H" <tinfolihat@nospamplease.com> wrote in
> news:L5SdnT8LxdU4BTDXnZ2dnUVZ_oidnZ2d@insightbb.co m:
>
>> I am looking on advice on replacing the timing belt for the subject
>> vehicle. 77K miles. Driven not too hard.
>>
>> Original timing belt. Am I "driving" on borrowed time? Shop tells me
>> replacement indicated at 72 months. Is factory part the very best or
>> should I seek something from another (performance) vendor?
>>
>
>
> One hundred and eighty months and you're wondering if you're on
> "borrowed time"??? Wow!
>
> Factory is best. And you'd best replace it NOW if you want to be sure of
> keeping that GS-R engine running!
>
>
>
Point taken. :-)

Funny thing, though, I had the vehicle 50K service in 2002 and the Acura
dealership in Louisville never mentioned the timing belt needing
changing [then].

Thanks again.