Thus spake "Pszemol" <Pszemol@PolBox.com> :

>"Tegger" <invalid@invalid.inv> wrote in message
>news:Xns9BF3AD3594E26tegger@208.90.168.18...
>> "Pszemol" <Pszemol@PolBox.com> wrote in news:gshiis.3f8.0@poczta.onet.pl:
>>
>>> <jenneylist@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:8bb6fd6c-8ce5-47e6-9daf-c963e5ced261@w35g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
>>>> Can You Really Run Your Car on Water Instead of Gasoline?
>>>
>>> No, you cannot.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> You can, actually. It just costs more to extract the energy from the
>> (hydrogen in the) water than you get back in power, so there's no
>> gain from using it.
>
>
>
>Well, you cannot run the engine on water instead of gasoline.
>Water or its vapours do not burn from a ignition spark or high
>pressure + temp in diesel engine.
>
>What you try to describe is running a car on a mixture of hydrogen
>and oxygen not running it on water.
>
>I think you listen to Obama's "yes we can" too much, Tegger :-))

"Yes we can" screw you over.

"Change" back from your dollar

"Hope" we didn't blow this one

--

- dillon I am not invalid

The RMS Titanic sank on April 15th. US income taxes
are due on April 15th. Coincidence? I think not.