On Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:48:58 -0500, "Mike Hunter"
<mikehunt2@lycos/com> wrote:

>Chevrolet no longer sell 1995 models. Just like the imports do not sell
>the crappie cars they sold years ago.

I've heard of Barracudas and Mako Sharks, but never a Crappie. Who
made it?

>
>Every manufacturer today is selling great long lasting vehicles that can
>easily be run up to 150,000 miles or more trouble free, if given the proper
>preventive maintenance.

But the typical vintage of a car hitting 150K today is 1995 or maybe a
little newer. If you are conceding that 1995 GM cars were crappy, how
would you know that the 2009 are good for 150K?

>The only real difference we found among them in my
>fleet service business is style and price.

Yadda yadda. The question to you, Mike, is: Should we give taxpayer
money to GM, Ford and Chrysler?




>
>
>
>"CharlesTheCurmudgeon" <n5hsr@comcast.net> wrote in message
>news:gkg9ld$1ql$1@news.motzarella.org...
>>
>> "Ribeye" <Chuck@Steak.com> wrote in message
>> news:4bLal.130686$_Y1.94315@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
>
>>
>> I would love to be able to buy a Chevy again, but I can't afford a car
>> that wants to be in the shop all the time. My last Chevy (1995) was a
>> real shop queen, and the shop wouldn't fix it. And things started rusting
>> before the first year was up. My current life won't tolerate that.
>>
>> Sir Charles the Curmudgeon
>>
>