Hairy wrote:

> "JoeSpareBedroom" <dishborealis@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:2WF0l.26374$v37.6961@newsfe01.iad...

> No wonder you don't like suv's.
>
>> We're not anti-SUV guys. Rather, we would prefer to send as little money
>> as possible to the country whichsend lessAmericans in Manhattan a few
>> years back.
>
> And what country would that be?
>
> > Were you too young to understand the news just after 9/11? Saudi Arabia,
> > of course. One of our worst enemies.
>
> BTW, I'd like to see your evidence that proves that Saudi Arabia " arranged
> for the death of 3000 Americans". I know that there was talk that there *may
> have been* "factions" within SA that supported the attack, but as far as I
> know, no credible entity ever accused SA of being behind it.

How many of the 9/11 hijackers were Saudi Arabians? How many were
not?

With what prominent Saudi family was GW Bush socializing when the 9/11
attacks occurred, and what was their relationship to al Qaeda?

Who were the primary financiers of the religious schools in
Afghanistan and Pakistan and the al Qaeda training bases in
Afghanistan?

What country's leadership went nuts when Death of a Princess aired
almost three decades ago? Think of what they would have done, oil-
wise, if we had accurately accused them of cohorting with the 9/11
hijackers.

It's very naive to not place the majority of blame with Saudi Arabia,
a nation whose royal family is full of Jew-hating, Christian-hating
religious fanactics, the most corrupt rulers in the world with an
average of only a fifth grade education. Keep helping al Qaeda and
Saudi Arabia by wasting energy.