Hairy wrote:
> "JoeSpareBedroom" <dishborealis@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:xfF0l.26370$v37.12252@newsfe01.iad...
>
> Why do you anti-suv guys turn every suv discussion into something sexual?
> I get it! You see suv's as reminders of your sexual inadequacy.
> No wonder you don't like suv's.
> >
> > We're not anti-SUV guys. Rather, we would prefer to send as little money
> > as possible to the country which arranged for the death of 3000 Americans
> > in Manhattan a few years back.
>
> And what country would that be?
>
> > You may have heard about it. This country is not
> > yet to the point where we can send nothing to the perpetrators,
>
> That would be an understatement.
> If all the suv's suddenly were capable matching the mileage of the average
> sedan, the difference in the amount of imported oil would be negligible, if
> noticeable at all. (my opinion)

Why an opinion rather than the facts? Oil consumption can be
measured, so there's no reason to inject baseless opinion.

> > Two parents and a kid can get around just fine in a mid-size sedan instead
> > of an Escalade, unless they are traitors and think it's OK that we
> > continue to finance the murderers of 3000 Americans in Manhattan.
>
> I'm sure you'd prefer to continue to finance the murderers of more than 2400
> Americans at Pearl Harbor.

Aren't the vast majority of those murderers dead and their descendants
admirers of the US? But if I accept your line of reasoning, then
Senator Richard Shelby of Alabama wants Detroit and its union workers
to go bankrupt so he can help the murderers' car companies.