On Thu, 27 Nov 2008 11:44:49 -0500, tww1491 wrote:

> "Tegger" <invalid@invalid.inv> wrote in message
> news:Xns9B5FA773EFF49tegger@208.90.168.18...
>> Tegger <invalid@invalid.inv> wrote in
>> news:Xns9B5F9F49B9033tegger@208.90.168.18:
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>> Also, didn't exactly see where the detent feels come from. I guess
>>>> from the plastic lock ring area?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I've updated the relevant page on the site to clarify handle "click"
>> operation. You may have to hit Refresh/Reload in your browser to see
>> the changes.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Tegger
>>
>> The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
>> www.tegger.com/hondafaq/
>
> Interesting info on torque wrenches. I have an old Sear beam type
> --seldom used any longer -- and have often wondered how accurate it is.
> Unless abused or damaged in some way, I should imagine a beam type would
> hold its accuracy over a long period of time or perhaps the life of the
> instrument?

bending beam offer the best accuracy/price ratio. their main drawback is
not being able to see the dial in all orientations, but other than that,
they're great. they can have advantages on things like cylinder heads too
because you can torque and hold - essential when dealing with a blind bolt
hole where lube is slowly squeezing out and would otherwise give a false
torque reading.

tilt-block type torque wrenches are notoriously difficult to keep in
calibration. split beam wrenches are accurate and robust and don't have
any of the tilt-block drawbacks because nothing is loaded when not being
used - they tend to be much more expensive though.