MLD thanks for the info. Others have told me the same info. So I will take
my Honda to the dealer. Thanks again Glenn

"MLD" <MLD@verizon.net> wrote in message news:g5vnk6$ais$1@aioe.org...
>
> "Glenn" <glowry@swbell.net> wrote in message
> news:7XQfk.2258$zv7.18@flpi143.ffdc.sbc.com...
>> My owners's manual for my 2001 Honda Accord EX V6 states that the timig
>> belt should be replaced at 105,000 miles or 7 years which ever comes
>> first. The problem is I only have 26,600 miles on the car but the Honda
>> service department that I contacted stated the timing belt should be
>> replaced due to the 7 year rule. I know that tires will deteriorate with
>> age, sun/weather, but I,m not to sure if that apply to a timing belt. I
>> would appreciate any information/advice on this subject. Thanks.
>>
>> Glenn Lowry
>>
> Both miles and time are equally weighted, so do the change. Your dealer
> will most likely recommend replacement of the drive belts and the water
> pump. Although you don't have that many miles on the car give some
> thought to doing the replacements since the additional cost is not that
> excessive.
> MLD