On Jul 17, 7:53*pm, "Glenn" <glo...@swbell.net> wrote:
> My owners's manual for my 2001 Honda Accord EX V6 states that the timig belt
> should be replaced at 105,000 miles or 7 years which ever comes first. The
> problem is I only have 26,600 miles on the car but the Honda service
> department that I contacted stated the timing belt should be replaced dueto
> the 7 year rule. I know that tires will deteriorate with age, sun/weather,
> but I,m not to sure if that apply to a timing belt. I would appreciate any
> information/advice on this subject. *Thanks.
>
> Glenn Lowry

Well, why would Honda even mention it if it wasn't necessary??
Sheesh.....

Replace it and save multiple thousands of dollars later.

Dan D
'07 Ody EX
Central NJ USA