Re: Difference between brand name intakes and "cheaper" intakes
"M.C. Tee" <tedwards@NOSPAM.roadrunner.nf.net> wrote in
news:bre665$liq$1@nntp-stjh-01-01.rogers.nf.net:
> bullshit, the v2 will not get you 25 hp, maybe an extra .5 hp, and a
> normal intake will get you about 2 hp, so thats 2.5 hp, intakes do not
> make that large of a difference unless your boosted. As for quality, a
> pipe is a pipe, get a no name intake *as long as its mandrel bent* and
> get a good filter, aem filters are made by k&n, as good as you'll
> probably find, then buy a bypass valve seperate. Save money and get
> the same results. If he's that concerned about brandname, go get the
> AEM intake for him, but the only difference is the sticker and the
> couplers are black with AEM written on them.
>
>
Actually,for the RSX-S,an AEM CAI produced 20 extra HP,per Honda Tuning
Magazine's dyno test.The issue was last year,around Apr or May.They did
flow bench and dyno tests on several short rams ,the two CAIs,and the K&N
filter.They had a lot of nice graphs,too.
The "Bomz" CAI I put on my 94 GSR made a -very- noticeable increase in
power,even below the VTEC point.I believe that has to be more than a half
or 2.5 HP increase.
--
Jim Yanik,NRA member
jyanik-at-kua.net
|