"ACAR" <dimndsonmywndshld@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:4d26e333-67dd-4994-886b-a7adb1dace3c@e23g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> On Jan 12, 3:06 pm, "tww1491" <twau...@cox.net> wrote:
> snip
>> to wonder what the fuss is all about. I guess I must be missing
>> something.
>
> As transportation the TL is superior but the new CTS is a far better
> driver's car. You are certainly correct that the heavily discounted TL
> is much less expensive than an optioned CTS and it would be hard to
> argue against Honda reliability (except for those transmissions).
>\

That's a surprise -- a Cadilac a driver's car.

> Then again, as transportation, the 2008 Honda Accord I4 is a better
> bet than the TL (using total cost of ownership and reliability as the
> criteria). My mother complains about the TL's poor in-town mpg but
> otherwise loves the car.