Tony Harding wrote:
> jim beam wrote:
>> Elmo P. Shagnasty wrote:
>>> In article <F5mdnejsVMXWIObanZ2dnUVZ_o3inZ2d@speakeasy.net> ,
>>> jim beam <spamvortex@bad.example.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> There ain't not give in that car. Nowhere.
>>>>>
>>>> driven a ford lately? there's a /ton/ of "give" in a honda.
>>>
>>> What kind of "give"?
>>>
>>
>> pretty much everything - cheaper glass, cheaper paint, cheaper metal,
>> cheaper design, worse tolerances, lower standards across the board.
>
> In what way has Honda lowered standards?

macpherson strut suspension!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


>
>> ford's plastic brake pistons are among of my favorites.
>
> Amusing, yes, but of little interest in a Honda NG.


except that when people say a modern honda has been cheapened so much
that there's no more "give", i say that's not correct - there's a ton
more "give" to be had in pursuit of lower costs. plastic brake pistons
are just one example.