So then, is your car absolutely the SAFEST rated car out there then?
I didn't think so.

But, if you were so much concerned about the safety of your family, so
much more so than all the SUV buyers as you have claimed, then
wouldn't you buy a car out there with the SAFEST rating, with all the
latest passenger protection features, such as the side and ceiling air
curtains, the side impact airbags, the anti-rollover systems, the
anti-skil control system and etc?

Does your car have all those features? No? Oh, how come????
Wouldn't you be driving your family in a car with all those safety
features since you said you were so concerned with your family's
safety? Would this mean then, that you care less about your family's
safety than those people who are indeed driving around in a car with
all those safety features I mentioned? By your logic and claim, yes,
it would make you to be a less caring father and husband since you're
not driving a car equipped with ALL those safety features.

Hard to argue with that, right? After all, it's your own logic and
implication you expressed yourself.

Lemme teach you something. You see, sarcasm only works when you're in
the right. SELF RIGHTEOUSNESS though, will always make you out to
look like an idiot. You're right about one thing though, you are
****ing weird.

On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 15:59:57 GMT, "Mark" <mark@particlesalad.com>
wrote:

>I guess you're right... chances are, if people are really intrested in
>safety, they wouldn't usually buy an SUV to begin with.
>
>That said, safety IS very important for me and my family, but hey, I'm wierd
>that way.
>
>"Steve Lee" <hate@spam.com> wrote in message
>news:brifmv0ka431gfk0sv8jb7utfauk4u524j@4ax.com.. .
>> I guess I am. But it's not as though there's a hug disparity between
>> MDX's and Pilot's safety ratings. Would you agree? Very marginal at
>> the most. There are people out there who recommend other SUV's which
>> has far inferior safety ratings over the Pilot and worse yet, there
>> are countless out there that drive them.