In article <1178118720.191050.69190@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.c om>,
RVS <rahulvsamant@gmail.com> wrote:

> My Honda civic sedan is now 7 years old, but has only 75000 miles on
> it. The manual says i need to change the timing belt at 105000/7 years
> (whichever is earlier). I still have 30,000 miles to go, however the
> number of years are done.
>
> Should i be replacing the timing belt even though i am 30,000 miles
> short, or should i wait for a few more miles.

OK, so what part of "the manual says 105000/7 years (whichever is
earlier)" is unclear to you?

Cheap bastard. You're looking for an excuse not to maintain your
car--and worse, you come to a freaking newsgroup.

How's that Usenet-sourced marital advice doing for you?