True enough, but a Honda Accord is a long way from a Rolls. Try a
4,000 or 5,000 mile trip in that civic then get back to us on the
enjoyable part. Of course if you are under the age of 40 it probably
wouldn't make any difference anyway.


On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 19:16:12 -0500, "Bob Jones" <email@me.not> wrote:

>Hey, some people needs a Rolls Royce to feel comfortable, others feel good
>enough on a bike. I drive 50 miles on a beat up highway every day in a Civic
>and find it enjoyable. You just need a break in period on a new car.
>
>"Dick" <w6ccd@k7yca.org> wrote in message
>news:ffh5331k7c9831p992q9vf9vk67fqq4due@4ax.com.. .
>> We have a 2003 Accord EX. In 2004 we bought a new 2004 Civic LX for
>> our granddaughter (she paid for it.) We drove it home (about 100
>> miles.) I know the new Civic's are really nice, but I have to say
>> there is really no comparison between an Accord and a Civic unless you
>> are just talking about something to get around town. When you get
>> them out on the road on a long trip, the Civic can't hold a candle to
>> the Accord when comparing ride comfort, performance and noise.
>> Especially in the mountains.
>>
>> Dick
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 21:17:46 -0500, "Bob Jones" <email@me.not> wrote:
>>
>>>I just can't tell the difference. After a while they all ride the same. I
>>>would get a new car over a used one any day.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>>
>


--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com