Art Wrote:
> I wouldn't buy an old car just for the navigation unless I could verify
> that
> updates are available. Many have changed formats and cannot be
> updated.
>
>
> Also an all new accord is coming out so current model will depreciate
> quickly.
>
>
>
> "planetx" <planetx@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1165235747.751028.116890@73g2000cwn.googlegro ups.com...
> >I have a 96 civic I am looking to get rid of and am torn between a
> new
> > civic and a used accord. I want to spend around 20k and have found
> the
> > following:
> >
> > 1. 2007 civic EX with navi,,sticker is just over $21,000
> > 2. 2004 accord EX V6 leather with 7k miles for $20,000
> >
> >
> > I like the navi. I have been sure I wanted a bigger car like an
> accord.
> > But that accord seems like a great deal. In fact I bet it goes quick
> at
> > carmax.
> >
> > So my questions:
> > 1) Are the 2004 as safe as the 2007? It seems honda has thrown tons
> of
> > safey features in the 2007 models as standard equipment.
> > 2) do 6 cylinders last longer than 4 cylinders? Less work to do? My
> 96
> > has 130k miles on it and then engine seems ok even though it makes
> some
> > strange noises.
> >

Actually the new car has the navigation. The accord just is bigger with
a v6


--
BlackGT2000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
BlackGT2000's Profile: http://www.automotiveforums.com/vbul...?userid=336868
View this thread: http://www.automotiveforums.com/vbul...d.php?t=650729

http://www.automotiveforums.com