I am trying to understand what was done?
I don't enough to say if they got it right or not..
Just comparing the before and after readings with the database, I
can't see improvements except for the Toe..
Front:
Caster: worse than before (not close to the mid-point before or after)
SAI:no change (no reference)
Curve toein: no change (no reference)
Camber: worse than before (the right reading is even closer to
the top of the range after than before)
Toe: improved
Setback: ??
Rear:
Caster: worse than before (left reading closer to the top of the
range after than before)
Toe: improved
Thrust angle & setback: ??
So in summary only the toe has been improved.. I had wear on the
outside of one tire, and the inside of another.. Does this explain it?
I am trying to understand what was improved and how?

Shep wrote:
> Where are you going with these questions, they got it almost perfect, some
> specs are not adjustable.

> >
> > front
> > measured database adjusted
> > caster left 2.82 1.80/2.80/3.80 2.86
> > right 2.11 1.80/2.80/3.80 2.13
> > sai left 7.96 n/a 7.96
> > right 6.44 n/a 6.44
> > curve left 0.3 n/a 0.3
> > toein right 0.5 n/a 0.5
> > camber left -0.1 -1.00/0.00/1.00 -0.25
> > angle right 0.84 -1.00/0.00/1.00 0.92
> > partial left -0.09 n/a 0.01
> > toe right 0.01 n/a 0.00
> > total toe -0.08 -0.04/0.00/0.04 0.01
> > set-back -0.11 n/a -0.09
> >
> > rear
> > camber left -1.22 -1.50/0.50/1.50 -1.35
> > angle right 0.33 -1.50/0.50/1.50 0.39
> > partial left -0.06 n/a 0.01
> > toe right -0.23 n/a 0.00
> > totaltoe -0.29 -0.00/0.01/0.03 0.01
> > thrust angle 0.29 n/a 0.01
> > set-back -0.12 n/a -0.15