"Sparky Spartacus" <Sparky@universalexports.org> wrote in message
news:18dHe.7150$6%2.1630@fe10.lga...
> jim beam wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
>>> 1. What did they cheapen that I can't see, and that may be more
>>> important?
>>
>> the ridiculous thing with red-lensed hondas is that nothing is
>> cheapened!!! they still use the extra bulbs, wiring, switches, etc. the
>> /only/ thing different is the lens - and that's specific to the north
>> american market. they're copy-catting detroit, but they're not even
>> taking advantage of the cost savings!!! potential class action exposure
>> without even the offset???
>
> Class action suit - on what charges? You can't simply say "Honda sux" in a
> US court and hope to collect big bucks (I hope!).

I suspect the vehicles are legal for sale, and meet all applicable lighting
requirements.
No lawsuit there.