mjr1001@pitt.edu wrote:
> motsco_ _ wrote:
>
>>-------------------------
>>
>>You've probably changed your timing belt at least twice by now, based
>
> on age.
----------------------------

> Actually it only has 77k on it, so the timing belt is most likely the
> original (I bought it with 43k).

----------------------------

If that's the case, you're living on borrowed time. I doubt a belt has
ever lasted FOURTEEN years . . . :-( Time is just as important as mileage.

'Curly'